The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa

被引:15
|
作者
Clements, Hayley S. [1 ]
De Vos, Alta [2 ]
Bezerra, Joana Carlos [3 ]
Coetzer, Kaera [2 ]
Maciejewski, Kristine [1 ]
Mograbi, Penelope J. [2 ]
Shackleton, Charlie [2 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Complex Syst Transit, 19 Jonkershoek Rd, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Rhodes Univ, Dept Environm Sci, ZA-6140 Makhanda, South Africa
[3] Rhodes Univ, Community Engagement, ZA-6140 Makhanda, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Equity; Human well-being; Livelihoods; Multi-functional landscapes; Social-ecological system; Sustainable development; TRADE-OFFS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; PROTECTED AREAS; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; VALUES; REDISTRIBUTION; VULNERABILITY; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104939
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land reform is an important socio-political strategy in many countries. Despite the importance of ecosystem health in attaining land reform objectives, human-nature interactions have been largely absent from contemporary land reform discussions. In this perspectives paper, we highlight why land reform programmes could benefit from considering ecosystem services in their planning processes, to better achieve their goals of socio-economic development and equity. Drawing on examples from South Africa, we argue that an ecosystem services lens can help achieve equity in land reform programmes by providing insight into how land-use legacies and the multi-functional nature of landscapes influence who benefits from land reform across space and through time. An ecosystem services lens also broadens understanding of how fragmentation and a changing climate may affect land reform benefits over time. In ignoring these human-nature interactions, and often unquestioningly applying one-size-fit-all approaches, land-reform policies risk missing the ultimate needs of beneficiaries and broader society. Considering these insights, we discuss practical implications of an ecosystem services lens for land reform programmes. These include the need for context-sensitive, localized land reform planning that accounts for ecosystem service heterogeneity, possible trade-offs, and beneficiaries' preferences and capacities. Accordingly, extension services need to possess local knowledge and avoid generic, top-down and inflexible approaches. These social-ecological considerations are imperative if countries are to achieve sustainable and equitable land reform.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land management implications for ecosystem services in a South African rangeland
    Petz, Katalin
    Glenday, Julia
    Alkemade, Rob
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 : 692 - 703
  • [33] Social cohesion for the unfinished business of land reform in South Africa
    Mbedu, Nkosinathi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN RENAISSANCE STUDIES, 2014, 9 (01): : 100 - 114
  • [34] Land Reform in South Africa: The Conversation That Never Took Place
    Makombe, Godswill
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2018, 23 (06) : 1401 - 1421
  • [35] Rethinking Land Reform and Its Contribution to Livelihoods in South Africa
    Rusenga, Clemence
    [J]. AFRICA REVIEW, 2022, 14 (02) : 125 - 150
  • [36] Political Compromise on Land Reform: A Study of South Africa and Namibia
    Kariuki, Samuel
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS-SAJIA, 2007, 14 (01): : 99 - 114
  • [37] Land-Reform Politics in South Africa's Countryside
    Ntsebeza, Lungisile
    [J]. PEACE REVIEW-A JOURNAL OF SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2007, 19 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [38] Environmental Sustainability and land reform in South Africa: A neglected dimension
    Wynberg, R. P.
    Sowman, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 50 (06) : 783 - 802
  • [39] Safeguarding Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Little Karoo, South Africa
    Egoh, Benis N.
    Reyers, Belinda
    Carwardine, Josie
    Bode, Michael
    O'Farrell, Patrick J.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Rouget, Mathieu
    de Lange, Willem
    Richardson, David M.
    Cowling, Richard M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 1021 - 1030
  • [40] Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa
    Egoh, Benis
    Reyers, Belinda
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Bode, Michael
    Richardson, David M.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (03) : 553 - 562