Does Bitcoin still own the dominant power? An intraday analysis

被引:36
|
作者
Wang, Jinghua [1 ]
Ngene, Geoffrey M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Sch Business, 12180 Pk Ave S, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA
[2] Mercer Univ, Stetson Sch Business & Econ, 1501 Mercer Univ Dr, Macon, GA 31207 USA
关键词
Granger Mackey-Glass; BEKK-GARCH; Cryptocurrency markets; AG-DCC; VOLATILITY; MARKET; PRICES; EXCHANGE; RETURN; MODEL; OIL; DIVERSIFICATION; HEDGE; GOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101551
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The study investigates the intraday dynamics and price patterns of the primary cryptocurrencies. The Granger Mackey-Glass (M-G) model is employed to examine the asymmetric and nonlinear dynamic interactions in the first moment using positive and negative returns. The bivariate BEKK-GARCH model is applied to identify cross-market volatility shocks and volatility transmissions in the cryptocurrency market. The intra-cryptocurrency market analysis reveals that Bitcoin contains predictive information that can nonlinearly forecast the performance of other digital currencies when cryptocurrency prices either are rising or declining. The dominant power of Bitcoin is not dismissed using the intraday data. Further, Bitcoin's intraday lagged shocks and volatility induces more rapid and destabilizing effects on the conditional volatility of other currencies than each of the other currencies does on BTC's conditional volatility. The virtual currency markets are dynamically correlated and integrated through first and second-moment spillovers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ANALYSIS OF POWER SPECTRA AND COHERENCE FUNCTIONS OF BIOPOTENTIALS DURING FORMATION OF POSTURE DOMINANT
    PAVLYGINA, RA
    MALIKOVA, AK
    HORY, Y
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 1979, 29 (06) : 1293 - 1302
  • [42] Venezuelan restructured electricity market analysis of a dominant firm's market power
    Dortolina, CA
    2001 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 1046 - 1051
  • [43] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HARMONIC POWER FLOW METHOD TO DETERMINE THE DOMINANT DISTORTION SOURCE
    Santos, Ivan Nunes
    de Oliveira, Jose Carlos
    de Paula Silva, Sergio Ferreira
    XI BRAZILIAN POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (COBEP 2011), 2011, : 136 - 141
  • [44] Power System Model Order Reduction Based on Dominant Modes in Modal Analysis
    Semerow, Anatoli
    Wolf, Thomas
    Wellhoefer, Sabine
    Luther, Matthias
    2017 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2017,
  • [45] Does political ideology still matter? A meta-analysis of government contracting decisions
    Chen, Yiying
    Lu, Jiahuan
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 102 (04) : 1681 - 1710
  • [46] An Analysis of a Mentoring Program for Baccalaureate Nursing Students: Does the Past Still Influence the Present?
    Ketola, Jarline
    NURSING FORUM, 2009, 44 (04) : 245 - 255
  • [47] Does Switching to a Western German Employer Still Pay Off? An Analysis for Eastern Germany
    Alm, Bastian
    Engel, Dirk
    Weyh, Antje
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2014, 234 (05): : 546 - 571
  • [48] A novel autosomal dominant locus for essential tremor: when linkage analysis can still drive gene discovery
    Pullano, Verdiana
    Brussino, Alessandro
    Cotelli, Maria Sofia
    Palumbo, Orazio
    Palumbo, Pietro
    Dimartino, Paola
    Cardaropoli, Simona
    Giorgio, Elisa
    Pavinato, Lisa
    Pippucci, Tommaso
    Carella, Massimo
    Borroni, Barbara
    Brusco, Alfredo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 : 474 - 474
  • [49] Synchronized phasor data based energy function analysis of dominant power transfer paths in large power systems
    Chow, Joe H.
    Chakrabortty, Aranya
    Arcak, Murat
    Bhargava, Bharat
    Salazar, Armando
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (02) : 727 - 734
  • [50] Does the Fukushima nuclear accident still matter? Analysis of its mediated effects on five dimensions of nuclear power acceptance by using the parallel multiple mediator model
    Kim, Geunsik
    Kim, Seoyong
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 49