Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions

被引:26
|
作者
Russell, Grant [1 ]
Kunin, Marina [1 ]
Harris, Mark [2 ]
Levesque, Jean-Frederic [2 ,3 ]
Descoteaux, Sarah [4 ]
Scott, Catherine [5 ]
Lewis, Virginia [6 ]
Dionne, Emilie [4 ]
Advocat, Jenny [1 ]
Dahrouge, Simone [7 ]
Stocks, Nigel [8 ]
Spooner, Catherine [2 ]
Haggerty, Jeannie [9 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Notting Hill, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Bur Hlth Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] McGill Univ, St Marys Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] PolicyWise Children & Families, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] La Trobe Univ, Australian Inst Primary Care & Ageing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Elisabeth Bruyere Res Inst, CT Lamont Primary Hlth Care Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Adelaide, Dept Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[9] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
mixed methods; multi site; primary health care; vulnerable populations;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. Methods and analysis The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3-6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. Ethics and dissemination The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary's Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13-30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Australia's first Transition to Professional Practice in Primary Care Program: Qualitative findings from a mixed-method evaluation
    Thomas, Tamsin H. T.
    Bloomfield, Jacqueline G.
    Gordon, Christopher J.
    Aggar, Christina
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [22] Social Prescribing Schemes in Primary Care in Spain (EvalRA Project): a mixed-method study protocol to build an evaluation model
    Pola-Garcia, M.
    Noguero, A. M. Carrera
    Astier-Pena, M. P.
    Mira, J. J.
    Guilabert-Mora, M.
    Cassetti, V.
    Melus-Palazon, E.
    Gasch-Gallen, A.
    Consortium EvaLRA, C. B.
    Azagra, C. B. Benede
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 24 (01):
  • [23] Social Prescribing Schemes in Primary Care in Spain (EvalRA Project): a mixed-method study protocol to build an evaluation model
    M. Pola-Garcia
    A. M. Carrera Noguero
    M. P. Astier-Peña
    J. J. Mira
    M. Guilabert-Mora
    V. Cassetti
    E. Melús-Palazón
    A. Gasch-Gallén
    C. B. Benedé Azagra
    BMC Primary Care, 24
  • [24] Development of a self-reported reflective tool on advanced access to support primary healthcare providers: study protocol of a mixed-method research design using an e-Delphi survey
    Breton, Mylaine
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    Sasseville, Maxime
    Beaulieu, Christine
    Abou Malham, Sabina
    Hudon, Catherine
    Rodrigues, Isabel
    Maillet, Lara
    Duhoux, Arnaud
    Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia
    Haggerty, Jeannie
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [25] Evaluation of the priority primary care centre program to reduce emergency department burden in regional Victoria, Australia: a mixed-method study
    Frith, Madison
    Randall, Sean
    Savira, Feby
    Swann, Jamie
    White, Naomi
    Giddy, Andrew
    McLean, Kirsty
    Peeters, Anna
    Robinson, Suzanne
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [26] PROTOCOL: What is the impact of complex WASH interventions on gender and social equality outcomes in low- and middle-income countries? A mixed-method systematic review protocol
    Macura, Biljana
    Del Duca, Laura
    Soto, Adriana
    Carrard, Naomi
    Gosling, Louisa
    Hannes, Karin
    Thomas, James
    Sara, Lewnida
    Sommer, Marni
    Waddington, Hugh S.
    Dickin, Sarah
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (02)
  • [27] Peer advocacy and access to healthcare for people who are homeless in London, UK: a mixed method impact, economic and process evaluation protocol
    Rathod, Sujit D.
    Guise, Andrew
    Annand, P. J.
    Hosseini, Paniz
    Williamson, Elizabeth
    Miners, Alec
    Bowgett, Kate
    Burrows, Martin
    Aldridge, Robert W.
    Luchenski, Serena
    Menezes, Dee
    Story, Alistair
    Hayward, Andrew
    Platt, Lucy
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [28] Improving access to high-quality primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: a mixed method study protocol
    Ford, John A.
    Jones, Andrew P.
    Wong, Geoff
    Clark, Allan B.
    Porter, Tom
    Shakespeare, Tom
    Swart, Ann Marie
    Steel, Nicholas
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (09):
  • [29] SLEEP-RELATED BREATHING DISORDERS AMONG INDIVIDUALS LIVING WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY: A MIXED-METHOD STUDY ON SCREENING SLEEP METHODS WITH FOCUS ON IMPROVING THEIR ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
    Furlan, J.
    Hitzig, S.
    Milligan, J.
    Athanasopoulos, P.
    Boulos, M.
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2024, 115 : 242 - 242
  • [30] Perceptions and evaluations of front-line health workers regarding the Brazilian National Program for Improving Access and Quality to Primary Care (PMAQ): a mixed-method approach
    Saddi, Fabiana da Cunha
    Harris, Matthew J.
    Coelho, Germano Araujo
    Pego, Raquel Abrantes
    Parreira, Fernanda
    Pereira, Wellida
    Santos, Ana Karoline C.
    Almeida, Heloany R.
    Costa, Douglas S.
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2018, 34 (10):