L1 AND L2 WORD RECOGNITION IN FINNISH Examining L1 Effects on L2 Processing of Morphological Complexity and Morphophonological Transparency

被引:11
|
作者
Vainio, Seppo [1 ]
Pajunen, Anneli [2 ]
Hyona, Jukka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT; INFLECTED WORDS; SENTENCE INTERPRETATION; MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; AFFIXAL HOMONYMY; LANGUAGE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; FREQUENCY; ENGLISH; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S0272263113000478
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effect of the first language (L1) on the visual word recognition of inflected nouns in second language (L2) Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. Case inflection is common in Russian and in Finnish but nonexistent in Chinese. Several models have been posited to describe L2 morphological processing. The unified competition model (UCM; MacWhinney, 2005) predicts L1-L2 transfer, whereas processability theory (Pienemann, 1998) posits a universal hierarchy in L2 acquisition regardless of the L1. The morphological decomposition deficiency hypothesis (Ullman, 2001b; VanPatten, 2004) claims that nonnatives cannot morphologically decompose words. Finally, DeKeyser (2005) proposes that morphophonological transparency affects nonnative processing. The current study explores which model best accounts for the processing of L2 Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. The materials included simple nouns, transparently inflected nouns, and semitransparently inflected nouns. The results showed that Finns and Russians had longer reaction times (RTs) for morphologically complex nouns, but Chinese had longer RTs for semitransparent nouns. The RT results support the UCM by showing a L1-L2 transfer. Furthermore, transparency influenced word recognition among nonnatives; they made the most errors with semitransparent nouns.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 162
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examining L1 influence in L2 word recognition A case for case
    Jiang, Nan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2021, 4 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [2] Processing Hyponymy in L1 and L2
    Farzad Sharifian
    [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2002, 31 : 421 - 436
  • [3] Processing hyponymy in L1 and L2
    Sharifian, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2002, 31 (04) : 421 - 436
  • [4] Morphological processing and individual frequency effects in L1 and L2 Spanish
    Lopez, Ezequiel M. Durand
    [J]. LINGUA, 2021, 257
  • [5] THE INFLUENCE OF SYLLABIFICATION RULES IN L1 ON L2 WORD RECOGNITION
    Choi, Wonil
    Nam, Kichun
    Lee, Yoonhyoung
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2015, 117 (02) : 535 - 553
  • [6] Effects of L1 morphological type on L2 morphological awareness
    Wu, Zhaohong
    Juffs, Alan
    [J]. SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2022, 38 (04) : 787 - 812
  • [7] L1 effects on the processing of grammatical gender in L2
    Sabourin, L
    [J]. EUROSLA YEARBOOK, 2001, 2001, 1 : 159 - 169
  • [8] L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2
    Portin, Marja
    Lehtonen, Minna
    Harrer, Gabor
    Wande, Erling
    Niemi, Jussi
    Laine, Matti
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (03) : 452 - 465
  • [9] WILLETTS 'L1 AND L2'
    CRAIG, R
    [J]. DRAMA, 1976, (120): : 72 - 73
  • [10] L2 Proficiency matters in comparative L1/L2 processing research
    Keating, Gregory D.
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2017, 20 (04) : 700 - 701