Impact of socio-economic growth on desalination in the US

被引:23
|
作者
Ziolkowska, Jadwiga R. [1 ]
Reyes, Reuben [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Geog & Environm Sustainabil, 100 E Boyd St SEC 650, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Oklahoma Climatol Survey, 120 David L Boren Blvd,Suite 2900, Norman, OK 73072 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Desalination; Water management; Economic growth; Macro-economic analysis; Econometrics; Time series analysis; US; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; WATER; FEASIBILITY; RESOURCES; AUSTRALIA; COUNTRIES; ISLANDS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In 2013, around 1336 desalination plants in the United States (US) provided purified water mainly to municipalities, the industry sector and for power generation. In 2013 alone, similar to 200 million m(3) of water were desalinated; the amount that could satisfy annual municipal water consumption of more than 1.5 million people in the US. Desalination has proven to be a reliable water supply source in many countries around the world, with the total global desalination capacity of similar to 60 million m(3)/day in 2013. Desalination has been used to mitigate water scarcity and lessen the pressure on water resources. Currently, data and information about desalination are still limited, while extensive socio-economic analyses are missing. This paper presents an econometric model to fill this gap. It evaluates the impact of selected socio-economic variables on desalination development in the US in the time span 1970-2013. The results show that the GDP and population growth have significantly impacted the desalination sector over the analyzed time period. The insights into the economics of desalination provided with this paper can be used to further evaluate cost-effectiveness of desalination both in the US and in other countries around the world. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Teleworking: Socio-Economic Impact and Perspectives
    Dabija, Dan-Cristian
    [J]. AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2021, 23 (58) : 579 - 584
  • [22] ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TRENDS IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF CAMBODIA
    Volchik, V. V.
    Shiryaev, I. M.
    [J]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2012, 10 (01): : 154 - 159
  • [23] Estimating the Socio-Economic Status of the US Capitol Insurrectionists
    Komlos, John
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2024, 24 (01): : 285 - 300
  • [24] Socio-economic mobility and air passenger demand in the US
    Hofer, Christian
    Kali, Raja
    Mendez, Fabio
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 112 : 85 - 94
  • [25] Growth of children living in the outskirts of Ankara:: Impact of low socio-economic status
    Gültekin, T
    Hauspie, R
    Susanne, C
    Güleç, E
    [J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2006, 33 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [26] Beyond the Socio-Economic Impact of Transport Megaprojects
    Montrimas, Andrius
    Bruneckiene, Jurgita
    Gaidelys, Vaidas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [27] The Impact of Socio-Economic Inequality on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding
    Richmond, Oliver P.
    [J]. CIVIL WARS, 2014, 16 (04) : 449 - 467
  • [28] Damage and Socio-Economic Impact of Volcanic Ash
    Jiang, Zhuhua
    Yu, Soonyoung
    Yoon, Seong-Min
    Choi, Ki-Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN EARTH SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2013, 34 (06): : 536 - 549
  • [29] Socio-economic impact and initiatives of diabetes in Indonesia
    Soegondo, Sidartawan
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 120 : S4 - S5
  • [30] SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE COHESION FUND IN LATVIA
    Abolina, Ilze
    [J]. RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2009, 2009, : 188 - 195