Automating engineering verification in ALMA subsystems

被引:2
|
作者
Ortiz, Jose [1 ]
Castillo, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Atacama Large Millimeter Submillimeter Array ALMA, San Pedro De Atacama, Chile
关键词
automation; integration; engineering verification; reporting;
D O I
10.1117/12.2054968
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array is an interferometer comprising 66 individual high precision antennas located over 5000 meters altitude in the north of Chile. Several complex electronic subsystems need to be meticulously tested at different stages of an antenna commissioning, both independently and when integrated together. First subsystem integration takes place at the Operations Support Facilities (OSF), at an altitude of 3000 meters. Second integration occurs at the high altitude Array Operations Site (AOS), where also combined performance with Central Local Oscillator (CLO) and Correlator is assessed. In addition, there are several other events requiring complete or partial verification of instrument specifications compliance, such as parts replacements, calibration, relocation within AOS, preventive maintenance and troubleshooting due to poor performance in scientific observations. Restricted engineering time allocation and the constant pressure of minimizing downtime in a 24/7 astronomical observatory, impose the need to complete (and report) the aforementioned verifications in the least possible time. Array-wide disturbances, such as global power interruptions and following recovery, generate the added challenge of executing this checkout on multiple antenna elements at once. This paper presents the outcome of the automation of engineering verification setup, execution, notification and reporting in ALMA and how these efforts have resulted in a dramatic reduction of both time and operator training required. Signal Path Connectivity (SPC) checkout is introduced as a notable case of such automation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automating invariant verification of behavioral specifications
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Ogata, Kazuhiro
    Nakamura, Masaki
    Futatsugi, Kokichi
    QSIC 2006: SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 49 - +
  • [22] Concurrent engineering: Supporting subsystems
    Thomas, M
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 571 - 575
  • [23] East Asian ALMA Imaging Team Studies with ALMA Science Verification Data
    Espada, D.
    Takahashi, S.
    Chapillon, E.
    Akiyama, E.
    NEW TRENDS IN RADIO ASTRONOMY IN THE ALMA ERA: THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF NOBEYAMA RADIO OBSERVATORY, 2013, 476 : 411 - 412
  • [24] AUTOMATING PRODUCTION PROCESSES IN ENGINEERING
    SHAUMYAN, GA
    RUSSIAN ENGINEERING JOURNAL-USSR, 1967, 47 (12): : 5 - &
  • [25] Automating communication in civil engineering
    Luiten, GTB
    Tolman, FP
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1997, 123 (02): : 113 - 120
  • [26] Statistical analysis and verification of performance for CSP subsystems
    Slack, M.
    Gross, D. A.
    Zavodny, M.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, SOLARPACES 2014, 2015, 69 : 1441 - 1450
  • [27] Automating the Verification of Floating-Point Programs
    Fumex, Clement
    Marche, Claude
    Moy, Yannick
    VERIFIED SOFTWARE: THEORIES, TOOLS, AND EXPERIMENTS (VSTTE 2017), 2017, 10712 : 102 - 119
  • [28] ALMA engineering fault detection framework
    Ortiz, Jose L.
    Carrasco, Rodrigo A.
    OBSERVATORY OPERATIONS: STRATEGIES, PROCESSES, AND SYSTEMS VII, 2018, 10704
  • [29] Safety engineering determines the automating solution
    Lust, Wolfgang
    Konstruktion, 2010, (SUPPL. 2):
  • [30] AUTOMATING ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
    TALLY, CW
    BROWNELL, RB
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1984, 47 : 360 - 360