Reliable and valid assessment of Lichtenstein hernia repair skills

被引:8
|
作者
Carlsen, C. G. [1 ]
Lindorff-Larsen, K. [2 ]
Funch-Jensen, P. [3 ]
Lund, L. [4 ]
Charles, P. [1 ]
Konge, L. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Med Educ, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Ctr Simulat & Skills Training, NordSim, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus Hosp, Inst Clin, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Clin Educ, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Capital Reg Denmark, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Lichtenstein hernia repair; Validation; Assessment; Surgical training; OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT; BASIC SURGICAL TRAINEES; TECHNICAL SKILLS; OPERATING-ROOM; RATING-SCALE; RESIDENTS; FEASIBILITY; RELIABILITY; MESH;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-013-1196-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Lichtenstein hernia repair is a common surgical procedure and one of the first procedures performed by a surgical trainee. However, formal assessment tools developed for this procedure are few and sparsely validated. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of an assessment tool designed to measure surgical skills in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Key issues were identified through a focus group interview. On this basis, an assessment tool with eight items was designed. Ten surgeons and surgical trainees were video recorded while performing Lichtenstein hernia repair, (four experts, three intermediates, and three novices). The videos were blindly and individually assessed by three raters (surgical consultants) using the assessment tool. Based on these assessments, validity and reliability were explored. The internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). The inter-rater reliability was very good with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.93. Generalizability analysis showed a coefficient above 0.8 even with one rater. The coefficient improved to 0.92 if three raters were used. One-way analysis of variance found a significant difference between the three groups which indicates construct validity, p < 0.001. Lichtenstein hernia repair skills can be assessed blindly by a single rater in a reliable and valid fashion with the new procedure-specific assessment tool. We recommend this tool for future assessment of trainees performing Lichtenstein hernia repair to ensure that the objectives of competency-based surgical training are met.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The U and the Sushi Roll A Conceptual Aid for Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
    Yu, Jessica A.
    Burlew, Clay Cothren
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (10) : 970 - 972
  • [42] Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis
    Decker, E.
    Currie, A.
    Baig, M. K.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 541 - 546
  • [43] A LOW-COST HERNIA MODEL FOR THE TRAINING OF THE SHOULDICE AND THE LICHTENSTEIN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
    Wiggers, Theo
    Nazari, Tahmina
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [44] Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System® for inguinal hernia repair
    Vironen, J
    Nieminen, J
    Eklund, A
    Paavolainen, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [45] Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis
    E. Decker
    A. Currie
    M. K. Baig
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 541 - 546
  • [46] A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills
    Yagci, Mustafa
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 24 (01) : 929 - 951
  • [47] A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills
    Mustafa Yağcı
    Education and Information Technologies, 2019, 24 : 929 - 951
  • [48] Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy
    Lars Konge
    Per Lehnert
    Henrik Jessen Hansen
    René Horsleben Petersen
    Charlotte Ringsted
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1624 - 1628
  • [49] Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy
    Konge, Lars
    Lehnert, Per
    Hansen, Henrik Jessen
    Petersen, Rene Horsleben
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1624 - 1628
  • [50] Chronic pain after reoperation of an inguinal hernia with Lichtenstein or laparoscopic repair following a primary Lichtenstein repair: A nationwide questionnaire study
    Oberg, Stina
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Baker, Jason J.
    Angenete, Eva
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 219 (04): : 701 - 706