Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization

被引:44
|
作者
Hirota, Morihiko [1 ]
Fukui, Shiho [2 ]
Okamoto, Kenji [2 ]
Kurotani, Satoru [3 ]
Imai, Noriyasu [3 ]
Fujishiro, Miyuki [4 ]
Kyotani, Daiki [4 ]
Kato, Yoshinao [5 ]
Kasahara, Toshihiko [6 ]
Fujita, Masaharu [6 ]
Toyoda, Akemi [7 ]
Sekiya, Daisuke [8 ]
Watanabe, Shinichi [8 ]
Seto, Hirokazu [9 ]
Takenouchi, Osamu [10 ]
Ashikaga, Takao [1 ]
Miyazawa, Masaaki [10 ]
机构
[1] Shiseido Co Ltd, Shiseido Res Ctr, Tsuzuki Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2248558, Japan
[2] Kanebo Cosmet Inc, Odawara, Kanagawa 2500002, Japan
[3] Kose Corp, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1740051, Japan
[4] Cosmos Tech Ctr Co Ltd, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1740046, Japan
[5] Nippon Menard Cosmet Co Ltd, Nishi Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4510071, Japan
[6] Fujifilm Corp, Minamiashigara, Kanagawa 2500193, Japan
[7] Pola Chem Ind Inc, Totsuka Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2440812, Japan
[8] Lion Corp, Odawara, Kanagawa 2560811, Japan
[9] P&G Japan KK, Higashinada Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6580032, Japan
[10] Kao Corp, Ichikai, Tochigi 3213497, Japan
关键词
skin sensitization; risk assessment; SH test; h-CLAT; ARE; DPRA; artificial neural network; JCIA; LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; TEST H-CLAT; SCREENING CONTACT ALLERGENS; PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST; HUMAN CELL-LINES; PEPTIDE REACTIVITY; DENDRITIC CELLS; TNF-ALPHA; POTENCY; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1002/jat.3105
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The skin sensitization potential of chemicals has been determined with the use of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). However, in recent years public concern about animal welfare has led to a requirement for non-animal risk assessment systems for the prediction of skin sensitization potential, to replace LLNA. Selection of an appropriate in vitro test or in silico model descriptors is critical to obtain good predictive performance. Here, we investigated the utility of artificial neural network (ANN) prediction models using various combinations of descriptors from several in vitro sensitization tests. The dataset, collected from published data and from experiments carried out in collaboration with the Japan Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA), consisted of values from the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT), direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), SH test and antioxidant response element (ARE) assay for chemicals whose LLNA thresholds have been reported. After confirming the relationship between individual in vitro test descriptors and the LLNA threshold (e.g.EC3 value), we used the subsets of chemicals for which the requisite test values were available to evaluate the predictive performance of ANN models using combinations of h-CLAT/DPRA (N = 139 chemicals), the DPRA/ARE assay (N = 69), the SH test/ARE assay (N = 73), the h-CLAT/DPRA/ARE assay (N = 69) and the h-CLAT/SH test/ARE assay (N = 73). The h-CLAT/DPRA, h-CLAT/DPRA/ARE assay and h-CLAT/SH test/ARE assay combinations showed a better predictive performance than the DPRA/ARE assay and the SH test/ARE assay. Our data indicates that the descriptors evaluated in this study were all useful for predicting human skin sensitization potential, although combinations containing h-CLAT (reflecting dendritic cell-activating ability) were most effective for ANN-based prediction. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The skin sensitization potential of chemicals has been determined with the use of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). However, in recent years public concern about animal welfare has led to a requirement for non-animal risk assessment systems for the prediction of skin sensitization potential, to replace LLNA. Selection of an appropriate in vitro test or in silico model descriptors is critical to obtain good predictive performance
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1347
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial Neural Network-Based Hybrid Model for Efficient Battery Management
    Chandran, Benin Pratap
    Selvakumar, A. Immanuel
    Sathiyan, S. Paul
    Gunamony, Shine Let
    NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 2023, 46 (02): : 109 - 112
  • [32] An artificial neural network-based model for predicting paratransit travel time
    Ukam, George
    Adams, Charles
    Adebanji, Atinuke
    Ackaah, Williams
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [33] Artificial Neural Network-Based Hybrid Model for Efficient Battery Management
    Benin Pratap Chandran
    A. Immanuel Selvakumar
    S. Paul Sathiyan
    Shine Let Gunamony
    National Academy Science Letters, 2023, 46 : 109 - 112
  • [34] An Artificial Neural Network-Based Approach to the Monetary Model of Exchange Rate
    Ince, Huseyin
    Cebeci, Ali Fehim
    Imamoglu, Salih Zeki
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 53 (02) : 817 - 831
  • [35] Artificial neural network-based hysteresis model for circular steel tubes
    Yang, Chuanchang
    Fan, Jian
    STRUCTURES, 2021, 30 : 418 - 439
  • [36] Artificial neural network cost flow risk assessment model
    Odeyinka, Henry A.
    Lowe, John
    Kaka, Ammar P.
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (05) : 423 - 439
  • [37] Chemistry-Based Risk Assessment for Skin Sensitization: Quantitative Mechanistic Modeling for the SNAr Domain
    Roberts, D. W.
    Aptula, A. O.
    Patlewicz, G. Y.
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 24 (07) : 1003 - 1011
  • [38] A Triple Artificial Neural Network Model Based on Case Based Reasoning for Credit Risk Assessment
    Wang, Qiang
    Lai, Kin Keung
    Niu, Dongxiao
    Zhang, Qian
    2012 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (BIFE), 2012, : 10 - 14
  • [39] Artificial neural network-based resistance spot welding quality assessment system
    El Ouafi, A.
    Belanger, R.
    Methot, J. F.
    REVUE DE METALLURGIE-CAHIERS D INFORMATIONS TECHNIQUES, 2011, 108 (06): : 343 - 355
  • [40] Accelerated System-Level Seismic Risk Assessment of Bridge Transportation Networks through Artificial Neural Network-Based Surrogate Model
    Yoon, Sungsik
    Kim, Jeongseob
    Kim, Minsun
    Tak, Hye-Young
    Lee, Young-Joo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (18):