Finite-difference modeling of SH-wave propagation in nonwelded contact media

被引:19
|
作者
Slawinski, RA [1 ]
Krebes, ES [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geol & Geophys, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.1512753
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Many geological structures of interest are known to exhibit fracturing. Fracturing directly affects seismic wave propagation because, depending on its scale, fracturing may give rise to scattering and/or anisotropy. A fracture may be described mathematically as an interface in nonwelded contact (i.e., as a displacement discontinuity). This poses a difficulty for finite-difference modeling of seismic wave propagation in fractured media, because the standard heterogeneous approach assumes welded contact. In the past, this difficulty has been circumvented by incorporating nonwelded contact into the medium parameters using equivalent medium theory. We present an alternate method based on the homogeneous approach to finite differencing, whereby nonwelded contact boundary conditions are imposed explicitly. For simplicity, we develop the method in the SH-wave case. In the homogeneous approach, nonwelded contact boundary conditions are discretized by introducing auxiliary, so-called fictitious, grid points. Wavefield values at fictitious grid points are then used in the discrete equation of motion, so that the time-evolved wavefield satisfies the correct boundary conditions. Although not as general as the heterogeneous approach, the homogeneous approach has the advantage of being relatively simple and manifestly satisfying nonwelded contact boundary conditions. For fractures aligned with the numerical grid, the homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches yield identical results. In particular, in both approaches nonwelded contact results in a larger maximum stable time step size than in the welded contact case.
引用
收藏
页码:1656 / 1663
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Finite-difference modeling of wave propagation in a fluid-solid configuration
    van Vossen, R
    Robertsson, JOA
    Chapman, CH
    GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 67 (02) : 618 - 624
  • [22] Finite-difference modeling of wave propagation on microscale:: A snapshot of the work in progress
    Saenger, Erik H.
    Ciz, Radim
    Krueger, Oliver S.
    Schmalholz, Stefan M.
    Gurevich, Boris
    Shapiro, Serge A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (05) : SM293 - SM300
  • [23] Dithering of absorbers for efficient finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic wave propagation
    Zeng, XS
    West, GF
    GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 63 (05) : 1799 - 1812
  • [24] Dithering of absorbers for efficient finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic wave propagation
    Veritas DGC GeoServices, Research and Development, 2607, 715-5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 5A2, Canada
    不详
    Geophysics, 5 (1799-1812):
  • [25] Finite-difference method for modeling the surface wave propagation with surface topography in anisotropic-viscoelastic media
    Zhou, Xuhui
    Huo, Shoudong
    Liang, Yao
    Dong, Shuli
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 217
  • [26] Finite difference modeling of seismic wave propagation in monoclinic media
    Kalyani, Vijay Kumar
    Sinha, Amalendu
    Pallavika
    Chakraborty, Swapan Kumar
    Mahanti, N. C.
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2008, 56 (04) : 1074 - 1089
  • [27] Finite difference modeling of seismic wave propagation in monoclinic media
    Vijay Kumar Kalyani
    Amalendu Sinha
    Swapan Kumar Pallavika
    N. C. Chakraborty
    Acta Geophysica, 2008, 56
  • [28] The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion
    Moczo, P.
    Kristek, J.
    Galis, M.
    Pazak, P.
    Balazovjech, M.
    ACTA PHYSICA SLOVACA, 2007, 57 (02) : 177 - 406
  • [29] Computationally efficient SH-wave modeling in transversely isotropic media
    Spies, M
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2000, 19 (02) : 43 - 54
  • [30] Wave Propagation Across Acoustic/Biot's Media: A Finite-Difference Method
    Chiavassa, Guillaume
    Lombard, Bruno
    COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (04) : 985 - 1012