Outcomes of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in a Diverse Patient Population

被引:83
|
作者
McNickle, Allison G. [1 ]
L'Heureux, Daniel R. [1 ]
Yanke, Adam B. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Rush Cartilage Restorat Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
knee; autologous chondrocyte implantation; cartilage; outcome; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE DEFECTS; THICKNESS CHONDRAL DEFECTS; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS; WORKERS-COMPENSATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; KNEE; TRANSPLANTATION; MICROFRACTURE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1177/0363546509332258
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation is indicated as a second-line treatment of large, irregularly shaped chondral defects after failure of first-line surgical intervention. This study examines the clinical results of a patient cohort undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation and elucidates factors associated with subjective improvement after implantation. Hypothesis: Autologous chondrocyte implantation will result in long-term functional and symptomatic improvement. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The cohort included 137 subjects (140 knees) who underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee. Mean defect size per patient was 5.2 +/- 3.5 cm(2) (range, 0.8-26.6 cm(2)). Patients averaged 30.3 +/- 9.1 years of age (range, 13.9-49.9 years) and were followed for 4.3 +/- 1.8 years (range, 2.0-9.7 years). Outcomes were assessed via clinical assessment and established outcome scales, including the Lysholm scale, International Knee Documentation Committee scale, and Short Form-12. Results: A significant improvement after surgery was observed in all outcome assessments including the Lysholm (41 to 69; P < .001) and International Knee Documentation Committee (34 to 64; P < .001) scales. Subjectively, 75% of patients indicated they were completely or mostly satisfied with the outcome and 83% would have the procedure again. Preoperatively, 32% of patients had a Tegner score of 6 or greater, compared with 82% before injury and 65% at most recent follow-up. Multivariate analysis identified age (P < .021) and receiving workers' compensation (P <.018) as independent predictors of follow-up Lysholm score. Twenty-one patients (16%) required debridement of the autologous chondrocyte implantation site secondary to persistent symptoms, whereas 9 knees (6.4%) clinically failed and underwent a revision procedure. Conclusion: Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a viable treatment option for chondral defects of the knee, resulting in durable functional and symptomatic improvement. Age and workers' compensation status are independent predictors of outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1350
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation of the Knee A Retrospective Comparison
    Manjunath, Amit K.
    Fried, Jordan W.
    Alaia, Erin F.
    Lin, Charles C.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Meislin, Robert J.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2024, 82 (02): : 118 - 123
  • [22] Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee
    Bartlett, W
    Skinner, JA
    Gooding, CR
    Carrington, RWJ
    Flanagan, AM
    Briggs, TWR
    Bentley, G
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05): : 640 - 645
  • [23] Patient -Reported and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes of Third -Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation After 10 Years
    Niethammer, Thomas R.
    Altmann, Daniel
    Holzgruber, Martin
    Guelecyuez, Mehmet F.
    Notohamiprodjo, Susan
    Baur-Melnyk, Andrea
    Mueller, Peter E.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (07): : 1928 - 1938
  • [24] Biomarker discovery for autologous chondrocyte implantation
    Wright, K.
    Richardson, J. B.
    Fuller, H.
    Humphrey, E.
    Jones, P.
    Kerr, A.
    Roberts, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 94 (01) : A46 - A46
  • [25] Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation A Systematic Review
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Siston, Robert A.
    Pan, Xueliang
    Flanigan, David C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (12): : 2220 - 2233
  • [26] Autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents
    Schmal, H.
    Pestka, J. M.
    Salzmann, G.
    Strohm, P. C.
    Suedkamp, N. P.
    Niemeyer, P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [27] Autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents
    H. Schmal
    J. M. Pestka
    G. Salzmann
    P. C. Strohm
    N. P. Südkamp
    P. Niemeyer
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 671 - 677
  • [28] Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the arthritic knee
    Minas, T
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 26 (09) : 945 - 947
  • [29] Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Adolescent Knee
    Macmull, Simon
    Parratt, Michael T. R.
    Bentley, George
    Skinner, John A.
    Carrington, Richard W. J.
    Morris, Tim
    Briggs, Tim W. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (08): : 1723 - 1730
  • [30] Knee microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation
    Von Keudell, A.
    Proffen, B.
    Vavken, P.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2011, 62 (03) : 171 - 186