Esports Governance: Exploring Stakeholder Dynamics

被引:37
|
作者
Peng, Qi [1 ]
Dickson, Geoff [2 ]
Scelles, Nicolas [1 ]
Grix, Jonathan [1 ]
Brannagan, Paul Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sport Policy Unit, Dept Econ Policy & Int Business, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
esports; sustainability; network governance; stakeholder; power; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.3390/su12198270
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Esports is a rapidly growing industry. However, the unidentifiable governance structure of the industry has contributed to a number of integrity-eroding activities. By exploring esports stakeholder dynamics, this paper answers the question, "Is the esports governance model sustainable?" Data were sourced from documentation, focus groups (N = 3) and semi-structured interviews (N = 6). Thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo. The findings suggest that (1) the current esports governance framework features some attributes of the "lead organisation-governed network", with the power residing mainly in game publishers; (2) the rising power of other stakeholders in the network seeking to address integrity issues has caused fragmentation of the esports governance framework; (3) esports governance is evolving towards a network administration organisation (NAO) model. Such evolution has a few challenges-most notably, the compliance of game publishers. Given the social impact of the integrity issues, governments should play a main role in facilitating a NAO model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Shareholder primacy or stakeholder governance?
    Schoenmaker, Dirk
    Schramade, Willem
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 69
  • [23] THE ILLUSORY PROMISE OF STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCE
    Bebchuk, Lucian A.
    Tallarita, Roberto
    CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 2020, 106 (01) : 91 - 177
  • [24] Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict
    Carney M.
    Gedajlovic E.
    Sur S.
    Journal of Management & Governance, 2011, 15 (3) : 483 - 507
  • [25] Exploring Esports' Action-Packed Future
    Green B.-H.
    ITNOW, 2022, 64 (03) : 10 - 11
  • [26] Corporate governance and stakeholder capitalism
    Shahrokhi, Manuchehr
    Parhizgari, Ali M.
    Hashemijoo, Mohammad
    Okafor, Collins E.
    Nishikawa, Yuka
    Dastan, Alireza
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2022, 48 (08) : 1123 - 1136
  • [27] Exploring private financing for biodiversity conservation: stakeholder perspectives and governance in the case of wildflower strips in Germany
    Buecheler, Hannah
    Bieling, Claudia
    Feuerbacher, Arndt
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [28] Exploring the configurational effects of contractual and relational governance mechanisms on stakeholder collaboration in prefabricated building projects
    Zhang, Lin
    Zhou, Jing
    Xue, Hong
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [29] Capable to govern landscape restoration? Exploring landscape governance capabilities, based on literature and stakeholder perceptions
    van Oosten, Cora
    Runhaar, Hens
    Arts, Bas
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 104
  • [30] Collaborative governance dynamics in innovation platforms: case of Malawi's District Stakeholder Panel
    Mikwamba, Kingsley
    Dessein, Joost
    Kambewa, Daimon
    Messely, Lies
    Strong, Robert
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2021, 27 (02): : 255 - 275