Possibilistic reasoning and privacy/efficiency tradeoffs in multi-agent systems

被引:0
|
作者
Wallace, RJ [1 ]
Freuder, EC
Minca, M
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Cork Constraint Computat Ctr, Cork, Ireland
[2] Ecora Inc, Portsmouth, NH USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In cooperative problem solving, while some communication is necessary, privacy issues can limit the amount of information transmitted. We study this problem in the context of meeting scheduling. Agents propose meetings consistent with their schedules while responding to other proposals by accepting or rejecting them. The information in their responses is either a simple accept/reject or an account of meetings in conflict with the proposal. The major mechanism of inference involves an extension of CSP technology, which uses information about possible values in an unknown CSP. Agents store such information within 'views' of other agents. We show that this kind of possibilistic information in combination with arc consistency processing can speed up search under conditions of limited communication. This entails an important privacy/efficiency tradeoff, in that this form of reasoning requires a modicum of actual private information to be maximally effective. If links between derived possibilistic information and events that gave rise to these deductions are maintained, actual (meeting) information can be deduced without any meetings being communicated. Such information can also be used heuristically to find solutions before such discoveries can occur.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 389
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DAMN: Defeasible Reasoning Tool for Multi-Agent Reasoning
    Hecham, Abdelraouf
    Croitoru, Madalina
    Bisquert, Pierre
    [J]. THIRTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THE THIRTY-SECOND INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE AND THE TENTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 34 : 13612 - 13613
  • [32] Designing for privacy in a multi-agent world
    Yu, E
    Cysneiros, LM
    [J]. TRUST, REPUTATION, AND SECURITY: THEORIES AND PRACTICE, 2003, 2631 : 209 - 223
  • [33] A formal framework for reasoning about opportunistic propensity in multi-agent systems
    Jieting Luo
    John-Jules Meyer
    Max Knobbout
    [J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2019, 33 : 457 - 479
  • [34] Parallel implementation of approximate reasoning and its incorporation into multi-agent systems
    Zhang, ZL
    Zhang, CQ
    [J]. ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 59 : 172 - 177
  • [35] Reasoning about Multi-Agent Systems Using Stochastic Petri Nets
    Lopes, Bruno
    Benevides, Mario
    Haeusler, Edward Hermann
    [J]. TRENDS IN PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF AGENTS, MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABILITY: THE PAAMS COLLECTION, 2015, 372 : 75 - 86
  • [36] A Reasoning System for Fuzzy Distributed Knowledge Representation in Multi-Agent Systems
    Maruyama, Yoshihiro
    [J]. IEEE CIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS 2021 (FUZZ-IEEE), 2021,
  • [37] A formal framework for reasoning about opportunistic propensity in multi-agent systems
    Luo, Jieting
    Meyer, John-Jules
    Knobbout, Max
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 33 (04) : 457 - 479
  • [38] Formal reasoning on knowledge and commitments in multi-agent systems using Theatre
    Nigro, Christian
    Nigro, Libero
    Sciammarella, Paolo F.
    [J]. SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 96 (02): : 233 - 250
  • [39] Reasoning about Imprecise Beliefs in Multi-Agent Systems with PDT Logic
    Martiny K.
    Möller R.
    [J]. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2017, 31 (1) : 63 - 71
  • [40] Strategic Behaviour in Multi-Agent Systems Able to Perform Temporal Reasoning
    Popovici, Matei
    Negreanu, Lorina
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING VII, 2014, 511 : 211 - 216