Clinical and radiographic outcomes after antegrade intramedullary nail fixation of humeral fractures

被引:5
|
作者
Mocini, F. [1 ]
Cazzato, G. [1 ]
Masci, G. [1 ]
Malerba, G. [1 ]
Liuzza, F. [1 ]
Maccauro, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli, Dept Orthopaed, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
Humeral fracture; antegrade nailing; fixation; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; SHAFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.043
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Humerus fractures are frequent, accounting for about 3-4% of all fractures in adults. Treatment for fractures of the diaphyseal and proximal meta-epiphyseal regions remains controversial: there is no unanimity in the scientific community about the superiority of surgical treatment over nonsurgical treatment and which is the best between possible surgical treatments. Among the choices for surgical treatment the most commonly used implants are the locking-compression plate and the intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic follow-up in patients who underwent surgical procedures for reduction and osteosynthesis of proximal or diaphyseal humeral fractures by means of anterograde intramedullary nailing with a straight-shaped nail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed in 56 patients who underwent surgical procedures for reduction and osteosynthesis of proximal or diaphyseal humeral fractures by means of antegrade intramedullary nailing using Synthes MultiLoc (R) system. Clinical data were collected using subjective quality of life assessment forms (SF12-v2), quality of life related to specific disabilities assessment forms (Quick-DASH, ASES score, WORC) and objective functional assessment forms (Constant-Murley score). The radiographic Follow-Up was performed at 30, 90 and 180 days from the date of the surgery. RESULTS: Almost all patients were able to return to a satisfactory quality of life, comparable with the one before the traumatic episode. The functional results were assessed as excellent or good with almost complete recovery of the range of motion and moderate recovery of strength. The residual pain encountered was moderate or zero. The average QuickDASH score was 17.7 +/- 4.3 (range 9.1 - 27.3). The average ASES score was 73.8 +/- 8.1 (range 58.3 - 88.3). The average WORC score was 543.3 +/- 100 [74% +/- 4.8%] (range 310 - 740). The mean Constant-Murley score was 69.6 +/- 4.6 (range 61 - 84). All patients had a fair or good consolidation of the fracture on radiographic examinations. The calculated RUST score was 4.2 +/- 0.4 (range 4-5) 30 days after surgery, 6.1 +/- 0.9 (range 4- 8) 90 days after surgery and 9.8 +/- 1.5 (range 7-12) to 180 days after surgery. No major complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the diaphyseal and proximal meta-epiphyseal humeral fractures with antegrade intramedullary nail provides excellent subjective and objective clinical results and good radiographic results. However, clinical studies with larger number of patients and longer follow-up are necessary. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S34 / S38
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures
    Ajmal, M
    O'Sullivan, M
    McCabe, J
    Curtin, W
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2001, 32 (09): : 692 - 694
  • [22] Closed Antegrade/Retrograde intramedullary fixation of central metatarsal fractures: Surgical technique and clinical outcomes
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Bagheri, Nima
    Nili, Ali
    Vafaei, Ali
    Ghadimi, Ehsan
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (04): : 1125 - 1129
  • [23] Locked antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures
    C. Iacobellis
    T. Agrò
    R. Aldegheri
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2012, 96 (2) : 67 - 73
  • [24] Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures
    Blazar, Philip E.
    Leven, Dante
    HAND CLINICS, 2010, 26 (03) : 321 - +
  • [25] Clinical and radiographic outcomes after paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures treated with combined intramedullary and lateral wire fixation: our experience in fifty-one cases
    Aymen Ben Fredj
    Hedi Rbai
    Farouk Chatbouri
    Marouene Berriri
    Abderrahmen Daadoucha
    Anouar Boughattas
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 2901 - 2906
  • [26] Clinical and radiographic outcomes after paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures treated with combined intramedullary and lateral wire fixation: our experience in fifty-one cases
    Ben Fredj, Aymen
    Rbai, Hedi
    Chatbouri, Farouk
    Berriri, Marouene
    Daadoucha, Abderrahmen
    Boughattas, Anouar
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (12) : 2901 - 2906
  • [27] Results of intramedullary nailing of unstable proximal humeral fractures in geriatric patients with a new antegrade nail system
    Mathews, J
    Lobenhoffer, P
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2004, 107 (05): : 372 - 380
  • [28] Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures
    Heineman, David J.
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    Sean, Sean E. Nork
    Ponsen, Kees-Jan
    Bhandari, Mohit
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2010, 81 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [29] Outcomes of Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Metastatic Disease: Impending and Pathologic Fractures
    Owen, Aaron R.
    Uvodich, Mason E.
    Somasundaram, Vivek
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (02) : 919 - 922
  • [30] Use of an elastic intramedullary nail in difficult humeral fractures
    Williams, PR
    Shewring, D
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1998, 29 (09): : 661 - 670