Clinical and radiographic outcomes after antegrade intramedullary nail fixation of humeral fractures

被引:5
|
作者
Mocini, F. [1 ]
Cazzato, G. [1 ]
Masci, G. [1 ]
Malerba, G. [1 ]
Liuzza, F. [1 ]
Maccauro, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli, Dept Orthopaed, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
Humeral fracture; antegrade nailing; fixation; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; SHAFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.043
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Humerus fractures are frequent, accounting for about 3-4% of all fractures in adults. Treatment for fractures of the diaphyseal and proximal meta-epiphyseal regions remains controversial: there is no unanimity in the scientific community about the superiority of surgical treatment over nonsurgical treatment and which is the best between possible surgical treatments. Among the choices for surgical treatment the most commonly used implants are the locking-compression plate and the intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic follow-up in patients who underwent surgical procedures for reduction and osteosynthesis of proximal or diaphyseal humeral fractures by means of anterograde intramedullary nailing with a straight-shaped nail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed in 56 patients who underwent surgical procedures for reduction and osteosynthesis of proximal or diaphyseal humeral fractures by means of antegrade intramedullary nailing using Synthes MultiLoc (R) system. Clinical data were collected using subjective quality of life assessment forms (SF12-v2), quality of life related to specific disabilities assessment forms (Quick-DASH, ASES score, WORC) and objective functional assessment forms (Constant-Murley score). The radiographic Follow-Up was performed at 30, 90 and 180 days from the date of the surgery. RESULTS: Almost all patients were able to return to a satisfactory quality of life, comparable with the one before the traumatic episode. The functional results were assessed as excellent or good with almost complete recovery of the range of motion and moderate recovery of strength. The residual pain encountered was moderate or zero. The average QuickDASH score was 17.7 +/- 4.3 (range 9.1 - 27.3). The average ASES score was 73.8 +/- 8.1 (range 58.3 - 88.3). The average WORC score was 543.3 +/- 100 [74% +/- 4.8%] (range 310 - 740). The mean Constant-Murley score was 69.6 +/- 4.6 (range 61 - 84). All patients had a fair or good consolidation of the fracture on radiographic examinations. The calculated RUST score was 4.2 +/- 0.4 (range 4-5) 30 days after surgery, 6.1 +/- 0.9 (range 4- 8) 90 days after surgery and 9.8 +/- 1.5 (range 7-12) to 180 days after surgery. No major complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the diaphyseal and proximal meta-epiphyseal humeral fractures with antegrade intramedullary nail provides excellent subjective and objective clinical results and good radiographic results. However, clinical studies with larger number of patients and longer follow-up are necessary. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S34 / S38
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANTEGRADE INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION OF HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES WITH INTERLOCKING NAIL - AN ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS
    Singh, Arvinder
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (45): : 8795 - 8800
  • [2] Fixation of humeral head fractures with antegrade intramedullary nailing
    Stedtfeld, HM
    Attmanspacher, W
    Thaler, K
    Frosch, B
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (01): : 6 - 11
  • [3] Quality of life after antegrade intramedullary nail fixation of humeral fractures: A survey in a selected cohort of Brazilian patients
    Cocco L.F.
    Ejnisman B.
    Belangero P.S.
    Cohen M.
    dos Reis F.B.
    Patient Safety in Surgery, 12 (1)
  • [4] Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail
    Tsourvakas S.
    Alexandropoulos C.
    Papachristos I.
    Tsakoumis G.
    Ameridis N.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2011, 95 (3) : 193 - 198
  • [5] INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING TECHNIQUE FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES USING A STRAIGHT ANTEGRADE NAIL WITH LOCKING TUBEROSITY FIXATION
    Davis, Brian P.
    Mauter, Libby A.
    Sears, Benjamin W.
    Hatzidakis, Armodios M.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [6] Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Pathologic Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Colello, Michael J.
    Hunter, Michael D.
    Tanner, Stephanie L.
    Porter, Scott E.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 43 (05) : E389 - E398
  • [7] Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures with an Intramedullary Nail: Tipps and Tricks
    Hans-Werner Stedtfeld
    Thomas Mittlmeier
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2007, 33 : 367 - 374
  • [8] Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an intramedullary nail: Tipps and tricks
    Stedtfeld, Hans-Werner
    Mittlmeier, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2007, 33 (04) : 367 - 374
  • [9] Humeral shaft fractures Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation
    Mohid Bhandari
    Joseph R
    Beate P.Hanson
    Dan C. Norvell
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, (06) : 81 - 83
  • [10] Intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures using an inflatable nail
    Lorich, DG
    Geller, DS
    Yacoubian, SV
    Leo, AJ
    Helfet, DL
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 26 (10) : 1011 - 1014