Benefits of marine protected areas for tropical coastal sharks

被引:8
|
作者
Yates, Peter M. [1 ,2 ]
Tobin, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Heupel, Michelle R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simpfendorfer, Colin A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Ctr Sustainable Trop Fisheries & Aquaculture, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Coll Marine & Environm Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[3] Australian Inst Marine Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
coastal; intertidal; ocean; conservation; distribution; marine protected area; fish; fishing; elasmobranch; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; DE-NORONHA ARCHIPELAGO; MOVEMENT PATTERNS; NURSERY AREAS; HABITAT USE; CARCHARHINUS-MELANOPTERUS; RESIDENCY PATTERNS; FISH ASSEMBLAGES; SPHYRNA-LEWINI; SITE FIDELITY;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2616
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. Coastal sharks face increasing pressure from anthropogenic impacts and environmental change. Estimated population declines in some species have created uncertainty about the effectiveness of existing management approaches. In particular, there are scarce data on the benefits of marine protected areas (MPAs) for sharks, including whether they can be used to conserve multiple sympatric species comprising diverse life histories and habitat use patterns. 2. This study used fishery-independent longline and gill-net surveys to investigate the effects of sub-bay-sized MPAs (c. 100-300km(2)) on the abundance and community structure of tropical coastal sharks. In addition, tag-recapture data from fishery-dependent and fishery-independent sources were used to investigate the movements of individuals across MPA boundaries. 3. Species composition varied significantly between management zones, and overall shark abundance on longlines was higher inside MPAs. 4. Length-frequency distributions of blacktip (Carcharhinus tilstoni/Carcharhinus limbatus) and pigeye (Carcharhinus amboinensis) sharks inside MPAs included a greater proportion of sharks larger than c. 800 mm compared with those in open zones, although results varied between gear types for pigeye sharks. 5. Tagging and recapture locations indicated repeated and potentially long-term use of MPAs by individuals of some species. 6. Although the potential benefits of MPAs were not equal for all species, coastal MPAs may increase the survival of young sharks to maturity, or shelter parts of breeding stocks, and therefore do not necessarily need to be large to provide benefits. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1080
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity
    Brodie, Jedediah F.
    Mohd-Azlan, Jayasilan
    Chen, Cheng
    Wearn, Oliver R.
    Deith, Mairin C. M.
    Ball, James G. C.
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    Burslem, David F. R. P.
    Teoh, Shu Woan
    Williams, Peter J.
    Nguyen, An
    Moore, Jonathan H.
    Goetz, Scott J.
    Burns, Patrick
    Jantz, Patrick
    Hakkenberg, Christopher R.
    Kaszta, Zaneta M.
    Cushman, Sam
    Coomes, David
    Helmy, Olga E.
    Reynolds, Glen
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Jetz, Walter
    Luskin, Matthew Scott
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 620 (7975) : 807 - +
  • [22] Spatial assessment of benefits of a coastal Mediterranean Marine Protected Area
    Stelzenmuller, Vanessa
    Maynou, Francesc
    Martin, Paloma
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 136 (04) : 571 - 583
  • [23] Spatial analysis of Protected Areas of the coastal/marine environment of Brazil
    Santos, Cleverson Z.
    Schiavetti, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2014, 22 (05) : 453 - 461
  • [24] Survey of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas in Sao Paulo State
    de Sousa, Evelin Eugenia
    Serafini, Thiago Zagonel
    [J]. DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2018, 44 : 360 - 377
  • [25] Social Value of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in England and Wales
    Pike, Kate
    Johnson, David
    Fletcher, Steve
    Wright, Paul
    Lee, Barbara
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 38 (04) : 412 - 432
  • [26] Environmental and human impacts on coastal and marine protected areas in India
    Krishnamoorthy, R
    Devasenapathy, J
    Thanikachalam, M
    Ramachandran, S
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE AND PROTECTED AREAS, 2001, 9 : 373 - 392
  • [27] Rate of biological invasions is lower in coastal marine protected areas
    A. Ardura
    F. Juanes
    S. Planes
    E. Garcia-Vazquez
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [28] Co-benefits of marine protected areas for nature and people
    A. Justin Nowakowski
    Steven W. J. Canty
    Nathan J. Bennett
    Courtney E. Cox
    Abel Valdivia
    Jessica L. Deichmann
    Thomas S. Akre
    Sara E. Bonilla-Anariba
    Sebastien Costedoat
    Melanie McField
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 1210 - 1218
  • [29] MARINE PROTECTED AREAS - AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL AREAS
    Todorut, Amalia Venera
    Tselentis, Vassilis
    [J]. GEOCONFERENCE ON ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, SGEM 2013, VOL II, 2013, : 193 - 199
  • [30] Stakeholders' perceptions of coastal development in relation to marine protected areas
    Lucrezi, Serena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 25 (04)