MRIQA: Subjective Method and Objective Model for Magnetic Resonance Image Quality Assessment

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Liu, Fang [2 ]
Duan, Huiyu [1 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
Min, Xiongkuo [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [2 ]
Zhai, Guangtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Image Commun & Network Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Renji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Medical Image; Quality Assessment; Database; Deep Learning;
D O I
10.1109/VCIP56404.2022.10008885
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely used for medical diagnosis, staging and follow-up of disease. However, MRI images may have artifacts due to various reasons such as patient movement or machine distortion, which may be unintentionally introduced during the procedure of medical image acquisition, processing, etc. These artifacts may affect the effectiveness of diagnosis or even cause false diagnosis. To solve this problem, we propose a general medical image quality assessment (MIQA) methodology, including subjective MIQA procedures and objective MIQA algorithms. We further apply this methodology to MRI images in this paper due to its widespread use in practical applications. We first establish a magnetic resonance imaging quality assessment (MRIQA) database, which contains 3809 MRI images. Then a subjective image quality assessment experiment is conducted by expert doctors according to the diagnostic value of these images, which split all MRI images into 1285 low quality images and 2524 high quality images. We then conduct a baseline deep learning experiment, and propose an attention based MIQANet model to automatically separate MRI images into high quality and low quality based on their diagnosis value. Our proposed method achieves a great quality assessment accuracy of 96.59%. The constructed MRIQA database and proposed MIQA model will be public available to further promote medical IQA research.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved Subjective and Objective Image Quality Assessment of Jpeg Image
    Bhargava, Chitresh
    Verma, Nidhi
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION COMMUNICATION AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICICES), 2014,
  • [2] Subjective quality assessment for objective quality model development
    Hands, DS
    Brotherton, MD
    Bourret, A
    Bayart, D
    [J]. ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2005, 41 (07) : 408 - 409
  • [3] Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for Stereoscopic Image Retargeting
    Fu, Zhenqi
    Shao, Feng
    Jiang, Qiuping
    Meng, Xiangchao
    Ho, Yo-Sung
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2021, 23 : 2100 - 2113
  • [4] Underwater Image Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Methods
    Guo, Pengfei
    He, Lang
    Liu, Shuangyin
    Zeng, Delu
    Liu, Hantao
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2022, 24 : 1980 - 1989
  • [5] Objective and Subjective Assessment of Digital Pathology Image Quality
    Shrestha, Prarthana
    Kneepkens, Rik
    van Elswijk, Gijs
    Vrijnsen, Jeroen
    Ion, Roxana
    Verhagen, Dirk
    Abels, Esther
    Vossen, Dirk
    Hulsken, Bas
    [J]. AIMS MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 2 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [6] Subjective Image Quality Assessment based on Objective Image Quality Measurement Factors
    Park, Hyung-Ju
    Har, Dong-Hwan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2011, 57 (03) : 1176 - 1184
  • [7] Subjective and objective quality assessment for image restoration: A critical survey
    Hu, Bo
    Li, Leida
    Wu, Jinjian
    Qian, Jiansheng
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2020, 85
  • [8] Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images
    Chow, Li Sze
    Rajagopal, Heshalini
    Paramesran, Raveendran
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (06) : 820 - 831
  • [9] Selection of image fusion quality measures: objective, subjective, and metric assessment
    Dixon, Timothy D.
    Canga, Eduardo Fernandez
    Nikolov, Stavri G.
    Troscianko, Tom
    Noyes, Jan M.
    Canagarajah, C. Nishan
    Bull, Dave R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2007, 24 (12) : B125 - B135
  • [10] Image Quality Assessment - Comparison of Objective Measures with Results of Subjective Test
    Zaric, Andela
    Loncaric, Matej
    Tralic, Dijana
    Brzica, Maja
    Dumic, Emil
    Grgic, Sonja
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ELMAR-2010, 2010, : 113 - 118