Image Quality Assessment - Comparison of Objective Measures with Results of Subjective Test

被引:0
|
作者
Zaric, Andela [1 ]
Loncaric, Matej [1 ]
Tralic, Dijana [1 ]
Brzica, Maja [1 ]
Dumic, Emil [1 ]
Grgic, Sonja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Elect Engn & Comp, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
来源
关键词
JPEG; Blur; Gaussian Noise; SSIM; MSE; MOS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Image quality assessment is a challenging task that is traditionally approached by computational models. To maintain, control, and enhance the quality of images, it is important for image acquisition, management, communication, and processing systems to be able to identify and quantify image quality degradations. A great deal of effort has been made in recent years to develop objective image quality metrics that correlate with perceived quality measurement. To find the right solution to this problem we need measures to estimate quality and amounts of degradation compared with original image to determinate optimal quality of the coded picture. This paper provides comparison of subjective and objective picture quality for three different distortions, each made with four different levels of distortion.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of image fusion quality measures: objective, subjective, and metric assessment
    Dixon, Timothy D.
    Canga, Eduardo Fernandez
    Nikolov, Stavri G.
    Troscianko, Tom
    Noyes, Jan M.
    Canagarajah, C. Nishan
    Bull, Dave R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2007, 24 (12) : B125 - B135
  • [2] COMPARISON OF SUBJECTIVE VIEWING TEST METHODS FOR IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    Liu, Tsung-Jung
    Liu, Kuan-Hsien
    Liu, Hsin-Hua
    Pei, Soo-Chang
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2015, : 3155 - 3159
  • [3] Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy
    Walsh, C
    Dowling, A
    Meade, A
    Malone, J
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) : 34 - 37
  • [4] Objective Image Quality Measures of Degradation in Compressed Natural Images and their Comparison with Subjective Assessments
    Cheeseman, Alison K.
    Kowalik-Urbaniak, Ilona A.
    Vrscay, Edward R.
    [J]. IMAGE ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION (ICIAR 2016), 2016, 9730 : 163 - 172
  • [5] Improved Subjective and Objective Image Quality Assessment of Jpeg Image
    Bhargava, Chitresh
    Verma, Nidhi
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION COMMUNICATION AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICICES), 2014,
  • [6] The development of a synthetic colour test image for subjective and objective quality assessment of digital codecs
    Punchihewa, GAD
    Bailey, DG
    Hodgson, RM
    [J]. 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), Vols 1& 2, 2005, : 881 - 885
  • [7] Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for Stereoscopic Image Retargeting
    Fu, Zhenqi
    Shao, Feng
    Jiang, Qiuping
    Meng, Xiangchao
    Ho, Yo-Sung
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2021, 23 : 2100 - 2113
  • [8] Underwater Image Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Methods
    Guo, Pengfei
    He, Lang
    Liu, Shuangyin
    Zeng, Delu
    Liu, Hantao
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2022, 24 : 1980 - 1989
  • [9] Objective and Subjective Assessment of Digital Pathology Image Quality
    Shrestha, Prarthana
    Kneepkens, Rik
    van Elswijk, Gijs
    Vrijnsen, Jeroen
    Ion, Roxana
    Verhagen, Dirk
    Abels, Esther
    Vossen, Dirk
    Hulsken, Bas
    [J]. AIMS MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 2 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [10] Subjective Image Quality Assessment based on Objective Image Quality Measurement Factors
    Park, Hyung-Ju
    Har, Dong-Hwan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2011, 57 (03) : 1176 - 1184