Preoperative Assessment Tool for the Planning of Inframammary Incision and Implant Profile in Breast Augmentation

被引:26
|
作者
Atiyeh, Bishara S. [1 ]
Dibo, Saad A. [2 ]
Nader, Marie [3 ]
Papazian, Nazareth J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Euromediterranean Council Burns & Fire Disasters, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Breast augmentation; Augmentation mammaplasty; Inframammary fold; Breast; 3-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATED IMAGES; PATIENTS SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; CHOICE; PREDICTION; SURGERY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-014-0381-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
When using the inframammary access incision for breast augmentation, careful planning is critical to allow the surgeon to set the inframammary fold (IMF) at the most optimal position, minimize scar visibility, and mitigate the main disadvantage of this approach. Current popular evaluation systems for breast augmentation include the High Five and Randquist systems and they base their calculations on inconsistent variables like skin stretch measurements. We propose a simple method that is not dependent on skin stretch measurements to properly determine implant size, profile, and position of the inframammary fold. Excluding digital scans and computer-based systems that are not universally available, the proposed simplified assessment tool was compared to the two most popular manual measuring tools (High Five and Randquist). Twenty-five female volunteers were included in the study. The projected IMF positions over the midsternal line for each measuring tool were recorded on each patient and the sternal notch (SN) to projected IMF distance SN-IMF1 (simplified evaluation system), SN-IMF2 (High Five System), and SN-IMF3 (Randquist system) were compared. The anticipated new IMF position is determined based on the vertical implant dimension and not on breast base width. For most subjects, the differences between the three evaluation systems were minimal. The proposed breast measurement tool constitutes a new, much simpler, and practical method that proved to be successful in our hands.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 886
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Lateral Inframammary Fold Incision for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Outcomes from Over 50 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions
    Blechman, Keith M.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Levovitz, Chaya
    Guth, Amber A.
    Axelrod, Deborah M.
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Choi, Mihye
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (01): : 31 - 40
  • [32] The NIU (Nipple-Inframammary Fold-Upper Breast Border) Principle: Preoperative Marking of the Ideal Nipple Position in Augmentation Mastopexy
    Chahine, Fadel
    Habr, Natasha
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (05) : 902e - 909e
  • [33] Commentary on: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Through an Inframammary Fold Incision with Implant-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Prior Cosmetic Breast Surgery
    Shestak, Kenneth C.
    Davidson, Edward H.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (05) : 558 - 560
  • [34] A comparative assessment of three planes of implant placement in breast augmentation: A Bayesian analysis
    Shen, Zeren
    Chen, Xi
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Chiu, Chiaoyun
    Yu, Yijia
    Lin, Xiaohu
    Zhang, Zhe
    Xu, Jinghong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (12): : 1986 - 1995
  • [35] Reply: The Pythagorean Theorem as a Tool for Preoperative Planning of a Concealed Scar in Augmentation Mammaplasty with Round Implants
    Bouwer, Lesley R.
    van der Lei, Berend
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (01) : 107E - 108E
  • [36] Implant Insertion Time and Incision Length in Breast Augmentation Surgery with the Keller Funnel: Results from a Comparative Study
    Paolo Montemurro
    Sebastian Fischer
    Sybille Schyllander
    Patrick Mallucci
    Per Hedén
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43 : 881 - 889
  • [37] Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type
    Namnoum, James D.
    Largent, Joan
    Kaplan, Hilton M.
    Oefelein, Michael G.
    Brown, Mitchell H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (09): : 1165 - 1172
  • [38] Implant Insertion Time and Incision Length in Breast Augmentation Surgery with the Keller Funnel: Results from a Comparative Study
    Montemurro, Paolo
    Fischer, Sebastian
    Schyllander, Sybille
    Mallucci, Patrick
    Heden, Per
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 43 (04) : 881 - 889
  • [39] Proper Skin Management in Breast Augmentation with a Periareolar Incision Prevents Implant Contamination and Biofilm-Related Capsular Contracture
    Youliang Zhang
    Weijin Hong
    Yin Chen
    Li Zeng
    Shengkang Luo
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2021, 45 : 1451 - 1457
  • [40] Proper Skin Management in Breast Augmentation with a Periareolar Incision Prevents Implant Contamination and Biofilm-Related Capsular Contracture
    Zhang, Youliang
    Hong, Weijin
    Chen, Yin
    Zeng, Li
    Luo, Shengkang
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 45 (04) : 1451 - 1457