Preoperative Assessment Tool for the Planning of Inframammary Incision and Implant Profile in Breast Augmentation

被引:26
|
作者
Atiyeh, Bishara S. [1 ]
Dibo, Saad A. [2 ]
Nader, Marie [3 ]
Papazian, Nazareth J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Euromediterranean Council Burns & Fire Disasters, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Breast augmentation; Augmentation mammaplasty; Inframammary fold; Breast; 3-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATED IMAGES; PATIENTS SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; CHOICE; PREDICTION; SURGERY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-014-0381-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
When using the inframammary access incision for breast augmentation, careful planning is critical to allow the surgeon to set the inframammary fold (IMF) at the most optimal position, minimize scar visibility, and mitigate the main disadvantage of this approach. Current popular evaluation systems for breast augmentation include the High Five and Randquist systems and they base their calculations on inconsistent variables like skin stretch measurements. We propose a simple method that is not dependent on skin stretch measurements to properly determine implant size, profile, and position of the inframammary fold. Excluding digital scans and computer-based systems that are not universally available, the proposed simplified assessment tool was compared to the two most popular manual measuring tools (High Five and Randquist). Twenty-five female volunteers were included in the study. The projected IMF positions over the midsternal line for each measuring tool were recorded on each patient and the sternal notch (SN) to projected IMF distance SN-IMF1 (simplified evaluation system), SN-IMF2 (High Five System), and SN-IMF3 (Randquist system) were compared. The anticipated new IMF position is determined based on the vertical implant dimension and not on breast base width. For most subjects, the differences between the three evaluation systems were minimal. The proposed breast measurement tool constitutes a new, much simpler, and practical method that proved to be successful in our hands.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 886
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative Assessment Tool for the Planning of Inframammary Incision and Implant Profile in Breast Augmentation
    Bishara S. Atiyeh
    Saad A. Dibo
    Marie Nader
    Nazareth J. Papazian
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2014, 38 : 878 - 886
  • [2] Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation
    Fanous, Nabil
    Tawile, Caroline
    Brousseau, Valerie J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2008, 16 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [3] A Simple Method for Proper Placement of the Inframammary Fold Incision in Primary Breast Augmentation
    Aboelatta, Yasser Abdallah
    Aboelatta, Hosam
    Elgazzar, Khaled
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 75 (05) : 497 - 502
  • [4] A Computational Tool for Preoperative Breast Augmentation Planning in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
    Georgii, Joachim
    Eder, Maximilian
    Buerger, Kai
    Klotz, Sebastian
    Ferstl, Florian
    Kovacs, Laszlo
    Westermann, Ruediger
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2014, 18 (03) : 907 - 919
  • [5] Incidence of Mondor disease in breast augmentation: a retrospective study of 2052 breasts using inframammary incision
    Khan, Umar Daraz
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (02) : 88E - 89E
  • [6] Patient and Clinician Reported Outcomes of the Inframammary Incision "Short Scar Technique" in Primary Breast Augmentation
    Montemurro, Paolo
    Cheema, Mubashir
    Pellegatta, Tommaso
    Heden, Per
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2023, 5
  • [7] Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane
    Gingrass, MK
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (06) : 2217 - 2218
  • [8] Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients
    Sun, Jingjing
    Mu, Dali
    Liu, Chunjun
    Ji, Kai
    Chen, Lin
    Liu, Wenyue
    Luan, Jie
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) : 699 - 706
  • [9] Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients
    Jingjing Sun
    Dali Mu
    Chunjun Liu
    Kai Ji
    Lin Chen
    Wenyue Liu
    Jie Luan
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2016, 40 : 699 - 706
  • [10] Nipple areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: A comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches
    Mofid, MM
    Klatsky, SA
    Singh, NK
    Nahabedian, MY
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (06) : 1694 - 1698