Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review

被引:25
|
作者
Paz-Levy, Dorit [1 ]
Yohay, David [1 ]
Neymeyer, Joerg [2 ]
Hizkiyahu, Ranit [1 ]
Weintraub, Adi Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Soroka Univ Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Hlth Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Charite, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Apical prolapse; Functional outcomes; Native tissue repair; Pelvic organ prolapse; Quality of life; UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ILIOCOCCYGEUS FIXATION; UTERINE PROLAPSE; SEXUAL FUNCTION; RISK-FACTORS; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-016-3032-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Central descent due to a level 1 defect is a main component in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reconstructive surgery, whether for symptomatic apical prolapse or for the prolapse repair of other compartments. A recent growth in the rate of native tissue repair procedures for POP, following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings regarding the safety and efficacy of synthetic meshes, requires a re-evaluation of these procedures. The safety, efficacy, and determination of the optimal surgical approach should be the center of attention. Functional outcome measures and patient-centered results have lately gained importance and received focus. A comprehensive literature review was performed to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of apical prolapse native tissue repair, with a special focus on studies reporting impact on patients' functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction. We performed a MEDLINE search for articles in the English language by using the following key words: apical prolapse, sacrospinous ligament fixation, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacral colpopexy, McCall culdoplasty, iliococcygeus vaginal fixation, and functional outcomes. We reviewed references as well. Despite a prominent shortage of studies reporting standardized prospective outcomes for native tissue repair interventions, we noted a high rate of safety and efficacy, with a low complication rate for most procedures and low recurrence or re-treatment rates. The objective and subjective results of different procedures are reviewed. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures have not been studied sufficiently, though existing data present those procedures as favorable and not categorically inferior to sacrocolpopexy. Apical compartment prolapse repair using native tissue is not a compromise. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures are favorable, have a high rate of success, improve women's quality of life (QoL), and result in high rates of patient satisfaction. This subject requires further long-term, standardized prospective studies following the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologists Association guidelines for surgical outcomes report, with the focus on patient-centered functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characteristics Associated With Surgical Failure After Native Tissue Apical Prolapse Repair
    Rahn, David D.
    Richter, Holly E.
    Sung, Vivian W.
    Hynan, Linda S.
    Pruszynski, Jessica E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (02): : 312 - 319
  • [32] Re: Letter to the editor: Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair
    Braga, Andrea
    Serati, Maurizio
    Papadia, Andrea
    Caccia, Giorgio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (12) : 2695 - 2695
  • [33] Re: Letter to the editor: Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair
    Andrea Braga
    Maurizio Serati
    Andrea Papadia
    Giorgio Caccia
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 2695 - 2695
  • [34] SINGLE-INCISION MESH REPAIR VERSUS NATIVE TISSUE REPAIR FOR ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Padoa, A.
    Tsviban, A.
    Smorgick, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S204 - S205
  • [36] Native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse by vaginal approach: A systematical teaching video
    Keller, N.
    Schmid, S.
    Haemmerle, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S156 - S157
  • [37] What is the Gold Standard for Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair: Mesh or Native Tissue?
    Brian K. Marks
    Howard B. Goldman
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2012, 13 : 216 - 221
  • [38] Transvaginal Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Anterior and Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sokol, Eric R.
    Tu, Le Mai
    Thomas, Sherry L.
    Erickson, Ty B.
    Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2024, 46 (11)
  • [39] What is the Gold Standard for Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair: Mesh or Native Tissue?
    Marks, Brian K.
    Goldman, Howard B.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [40] NATIVE-TISSUE REPAIR OF VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE: ILIOCOCCYGEUS VERSUS SACROSPINOUS FIXATION
    Vellucci, Francesca
    Frigerio, Matteo
    Manodoro, Stefano
    Cola, Alice
    Sicuri, Martina
    Palmieri, Stefania
    Milani, Rodolfo
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S40 - S40