The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT

被引:85
|
作者
Kim, Jung-In [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Park, So-Yeon [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Kim, Hak Jae [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Kim, Jin Ho [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ye, Sung-Joon [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Park, Jong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Adv Inst Convergence Technol, Ctr Convergence Res Robot, Suwon, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Interdiciplinary Program Radiat Appl Life Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Program Biomed Radiat Sci, Dept Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul, South Korea
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Patient-specific quality assurance; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Gamma-index method; Dose-volumetric indicator; High-definition multi-leaf collimator; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; PLAN VERIFICATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; PASSING RATES; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; DELIVERY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-9-167
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To investigate the sensitivity of various gamma criteria used in the gamma-index method for patient-specific volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using a flattening filter free (FFF) photon beam. Methods: Three types of intentional misalignments were introduced to original high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) plans. The first type, referred to Class Out, involved the opening of each bank of leaves. The second type, Class In, involved the closing of each bank of leaves. The third type, Class Shift, involved the shifting of each bank of leaves towards the ground. Patient-specific QAs for the original and the modified plans were performed with MapCHECK2 and EBT2 films. The sensitivity of the gamma-index method using criteria of 1%/1 mm, 1.5%/1.5 mm, 1%/2 mm, 2%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm was investigated with absolute passing rates according to the magnitudes of MLCs misalignments. In addition, the changes in dose-volumetric indicators due to the magnitudes of MLC misalignments were investigated. The correlations between passing rates and the changes in dose-volumetric indicators were also investigated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (gamma). Results: The criterion of 2%/1 mm was able to detect Class Out and Class In MLC misalignments of 0.5 mm and Class Shift misalignments of 1 mm. The widely adopted clinical criterion of 2%/2 mm was not able to detect 0.5 mm MLC errors of the Class Out or Class In types, and also unable to detect 3 mm Class Shift errors. No correlations were observed between dose-volumetric changes and gamma passing rates (gamma < 0.8). Conclusions: Gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm was found to be suitable as a tolerance level with passing rates of 90% and 80% for patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT when using MapCHECK2 and EBT2 film, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT
    Jung-in Kim
    So-Yeon Park
    Hak Jae Kim
    Jin Ho Kim
    Sung-Joon Ye
    Jong Min Park
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [2] Study on the Sensitivity of Gamma-Index Evaluation Methods to Positioning Errors of High-Definition MLC of True Beam STx in VMAT Quality Assurance for SBRT
    Hwang, S.
    Ye, S.
    Park, J.
    Kim, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S858 - S859
  • [3] The Sensitivity of Gamma Index to Detect MLC Positioning Errors Using Varian EPID and ArcCHECK for Patient-Specific VMAT QA
    Maraghechi, B.
    Darko, J.
    Davis, J.
    Mitchell, N.
    Shah, M.
    Fleck, A.
    Osei, E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2887 - 2887
  • [4] On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC positioning errors
    Yan, Guanghua
    Liu, Chihray
    Simon, Thomas A.
    Peng, Lee-Cheng
    Fox, Christopher
    Li, Jonathan G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (01): : 120 - 128
  • [5] On the Sensitivity of Patient-Specific IMRT QA to MLC Position Errors
    Yan, G.
    Simon, T.
    Peng, L.
    Fox, C.
    Liu, C.
    Li, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [6] Sensitivity of Enhanced Gamma Index to Patient Specific VMAT QA
    Sethi, A.
    Cozzi, J.
    Lavvafi, H.
    Ingram, J.
    Patel, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E432 - E432
  • [7] An Enhanced Gamma Index for Patient Specific VMAT QA
    Patel, R.
    Sethi, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3272 - 3272
  • [8] Eliminating Errors in Setup and Positioning for Patient-Specific IMRT QA
    Kamath, S.
    Palta, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [9] Refinement of MLC modeling improves commercial QA dosimetry system for SRS and SBRT patient-specific QA
    Hillman, Yair
    Kim, Josh
    Chetty, Indrin
    Wen, Ning
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1351 - 1359
  • [10] Error detection sensitivity test using complex errors on three patient-specific VMAT QA systems
    Thongsawad, S.
    Srisatit, S.
    Fuangrod, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2019, 1285