Who requests their sperm donor's identity? The first ten years of information releases to adults with open-identity donors

被引:41
|
作者
Scheib, Joanna E. [1 ,2 ]
Ruby, Alice [2 ]
Benward, Jean
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Sperm Bank Calif, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
Open-identity donation; information sharing; third-party family building; sperm donors; ANONYMOUS GAMETE DONATION; FOLLOW-UP; INSEMINATION; CHILDREN; PARENTS; EXPERIENCES; DISCLOSURE; CONTACT; FEMALE; MOTIVATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To report findings from 10 years of requests from adults eligible to obtain their open-identity sperm donor's information. Design: Analysis of archived family and donor data. Semistructured interviews at information releases. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): A total of 85 DI adults requesting 43 donor identities; program data on 256 DI families. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): We identified [1] demographic predictors of requesting donor identities, [2] information release timing and length, and [3] request motives. Result(s): Just >35% of eligible DI adults requested their donor's identity. Adults ranged from 18-27 years, requesting at median age 18 years. More women than men requested. Proportionally fewer adults requested when they had heterosexual-couple parents, and proportionally more when they had one rather than two parents. In interviews, the common theme was wanting to know more about the donor, especially about shared characteristics. Most adults planned to contact their donor. More than 94% of adults had donors who were open to contact; adults expressed modest expectations about this contact. Conclusion(s): In 2001, the first adults became eligible to obtain their open-identity sperm donor's information. Ten years of identity requests at one program indicates that information about one's donor is important to a significant proportion of these DI adults. Most requested their donor's identity soon after becoming eligible, suggesting some urgency to wanting the information. Interview data highlighted the role of donor information in helping adults better understand themselves and their ancestry. Findings hold important implications for practice and policy. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 493
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donors
    Leeb-Lundberg, S
    Kjellberg, S
    Sydsjö, G
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (01) : 78 - 81
  • [12] Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring’s Wishes and Needs?
    An Ravelingien
    Veerle Provoost
    Guido Pennings
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2015, 12 : 503 - 509
  • [13] Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring’s Wishes and Needs?
    Marja Visser
    Monique H. Mochtar
    Fulco van der Veen
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2016, 13 : 363 - 364
  • [14] Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds
    Scheib, JE
    Riordan, M
    Rubin, S
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (01) : 239 - 252
  • [15] Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor (vol 2020, hoaa057, 2020)
    Scheib, J. E.
    McCormick, E.
    Benward, J.
    Ruby, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2021, 2021 (01)
  • [16] Are open-identity oocyte and sperm donors ready for the release of their identity to offspring conceived with their gametes? Follow-up 14-17 years post-donation
    Lampic, C.
    Bladh, M.
    Svanberg, A. Skoog
    Sydsjo, G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I425 - I425
  • [17] National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden
    Lampic, Claudia
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    Gudmundsson, Johannes
    Leandersson, Pia
    Solensten, Nils-Gunnar
    Thurin-Kjellberg, Ann
    Wanggren, Kjell
    Sydsjo, Gunilla
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (03) : 510 - 521
  • [18] NOW WHAT? DONOR-CONCEIVED ADULT FEELINGS AND CHOICES AFTER LEARNING THE DONOR'S IDENTITY THROUGH AN OPEN-IDENTITY PROGRAM
    Scheib, Joanna
    McCormick, Emily
    Benward, Jean M.
    Ruby, Alice H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E17 - E17
  • [19] Group work with couples opting for donor insemination: predominant issues within a legislation requiring open-identity donors
    Emery, M.
    Wirthner, D.
    Germond, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I14 - I14
  • [20] Satisfaction with known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donors: reports from lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents
    Gartrell, Nanette K.
    Bos, Henny
    Goldberg, Naomi G.
    Deck, Amalia
    van Rijn-van Gelderen, Loes
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (01) : 242 - 248