Laparoscopic versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Meta-analysis

We conducted our meta-analysis to compare outcomes between laparoscopic resection and open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from all published comparative studies in the literature. Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI, were searched to identify studies comparing outcomes after laparoscopic resection and open resection for gastric GISTs. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1. Eleven comparative studies comprising 495 patients were identified. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs were found to have similar operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.01 to 11.43; P < 0.74) and complications rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.58; P < 0.46). Less intraoperative blood loss (WMD, -55.91; 95% CI, -90.26 to -21.56; P < 0.001), earlier passing first flatus (WMD, -0.89, 95% CI, -1.60 to -0.18; P < 0.01), earlier having the first liquid diet (WMD, -1.54; 95% CI, -2.44 to -0.64; P < 0.0008), and shorter hospital stay (WMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.63 to -2.88; P = 0.00001) were observed in the laparoscopic resection group. The recurrence rate was higher in the group of open resection compared with the group of laparoscopic resection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.75; P < 0.01). Laparoscopic resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with gastric GISTs as compared with open resection procedure. Laparoscopic resection may be a preferred treatment for gastric GISTs.