Evaluation of the potential of automatic segmentation of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography

被引:15
|
作者
Gerlach, Nicolaas Lucius [1 ,2 ]
Meijer, Gerrit Jacobus [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Kroon, Dirk-Jan [3 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald Maria [4 ]
Berge, Stefaan Jozef [1 ,2 ]
Maal, Thomas Jan Jaap [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] 3D Facial Imaging Res Grp Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Signals & Syst Grp, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent & Curat Dent, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Periodontol & Biomat, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Mandibular canal; automatic tracing; cadaver; cone-beam CT; 3-dimensional imaging; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; EXTRACTION; ACCURACY; IMPLANTS; BONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.253
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of software for automatically tracing the mandibular canal on data from cone-beam computed tomography (CT). After the data had been collected from one dentate and one edentate fresh cadaver head, both a trained Active Shape Model (ASM) and an Active Appearance Model (AAM) were used to automatically segment the canals from the mandibular to the mental foramen. Semiautomatic segmentation was also evaluated by providing the models with manual annotations of the foramina. To find out if the tracings were in accordance with the actual anatomy, we compared the position of the automatic mandibular canal segmentations, as displayed on cross-sectional cone-beam CT views, with histological sections of exactly the same region. The significance of differences between results were analysed with the help of Fisher's exact test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. When tracings based on AAM and ASM were used, differences between cone-beam CT and histological measurements varied up to 3.45mm and 4.44mm, respectively. Manual marking of the mandibular and mental foramina did not improve the results, and there were no significant differences (p=0.097) among the methods. The accuracy of automatic segmentation of the mandibular canal by the AAM and ASM methods is inadequate for use in clinical practice. Copyright (C) 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 844
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Layered deep learning for automatic mandibular segmentation in cone-beam computed tomography
    Verhelst, Pieter-Jan
    Smolders, Andreas
    Beznik, Thomas
    Meewis, Jeroen
    Vandemeulebroucke, Arne
    Shaheen, Eman
    Van Gerven, Adriaan
    Willems, Holger
    Politis, Constantinus
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 114
  • [2] Evaluation of the Mandibular Canal Visibility on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images of the Mandible
    Shokri, Abbas
    Shakibaei, Zahra
    Langaroodi, Adineh Javadian
    Safaei, Mehran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (03) : E273 - E277
  • [3] Mandibular Canal Branching Assessed With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Khojastepour, Leila
    Nasiri, Mohammad Mehdi
    Hashemi, Khadijeh
    Ahrari, Farzaneh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (08) : E767 - E771
  • [4] Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination
    Koivisto, Tyler
    Chiona, Daphne
    Milroy, Laura L.
    McClanahan, Scott B.
    Ahmad, Mansur
    Bowles, Walter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2016, 42 (07) : 1018 - 1021
  • [5] Variations of the bony canal in the mandibular ramus using cone-beam computed tomography
    Naitoh, Munetaka
    Nakahara, Kino
    Suenaga, Yutaka
    Gotoh, Kenichi
    Kondo, Shintaro
    Ariji, Eiichiro
    [J]. ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 26 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [6] Radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography
    Lizio, Giuseppe
    Pelliccioni, Gian Andrea
    Ghigi, Gino
    Fanelli, Alessandro
    Marchetti, Claudio
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (3-4) : 650 - 655
  • [7] Variations of the bony canal in the mandibular ramus using cone-beam computed tomography
    Munetaka Naitoh
    Kino Nakahara
    Yutaka Suenaga
    Kenichi Gotoh
    Shintaro Kondo
    Eiichiro Ariji
    [J]. Oral Radiology, 2010, 26 : 36 - 40
  • [8] Morphological evaluation of the mandibular lingula using cone-beam computed tomography
    Senel, B.
    Ozkan, A.
    Altug, H. A.
    [J]. FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2015, 74 (04) : 497 - 502
  • [9] Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography
    Makris, Nikos
    Stamatakis, Harry
    Syriopoulos, Kostas
    Tsiklakis, Kostas
    van der Stelt, Paul F.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (07) : 766 - 771
  • [10] Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal: A study using cone-beam computed tomography
    Leandro do Nascimento, Eduarda Helena
    dos Anjos Pontual, Maria Luiza
    Pontual, Andrea dos Anjos
    da Cruz Perez, Danyel Elias
    Figueiroa, Jose Natal
    Gomes Frazao, Marco Antonio
    de Moraes Ramos-Perez, Flavia Maria
    [J]. IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2016, 46 (02) : 69 - 75