Phase 1 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Neoadjuvant to Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Parikh, Neil R. [1 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [1 ,2 ]
Kane, Nathanael [1 ]
Diaz-Perez, Silvia [1 ]
Ganapathy, Ekambaram [1 ]
Nazarian, Ramin [2 ]
Felix, Carol [1 ]
Mathis, Colleen [2 ]
Bradley, Margaret [2 ]
Sachdeva, Ankush [2 ]
Wyatt, Bashir [2 ]
Basehart, Vince [1 ]
Zomorodian, Nazy [2 ]
Lin, Lin [2 ]
King, Christopher R. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick A. [1 ]
Rettig, Matthew B. [2 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Cao, Minsong [1 ]
Knudsen, Beatrice S. [3 ,4 ]
Elashoff, David [5 ]
Schaue, Dorthe [1 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [2 ]
Nickols, Nicholas G. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Radiat Therapy Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) neoadjuvant to radical prostatectomy (RP) in a phase 1 trial. The primary endpoint was treatment completion rate without severe acute surgical complications. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported quality of life and physician-reported toxicities. Methods and Materials: Patients with nonmetastatic high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer received 24 Gy in 3 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles over 5 days, completed 2 weeks before RP. Patients with pN1 disease were treated after multidisciplinary discussion and shared decision making. Patient-reported quality of life (International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26-item version questionnaires) and physician-reported toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03) were assessed before SBRT, immediately before surgery, and at 3-month intervals for 1 year. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled, and 11 completed treatment (1 patient had advanced disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography after enrollment but before treatment). There were no significant surgical complications. After RP, 2 patients underwent additional radiation therapy to nodes with androgen suppression for pN1 disease. Median follow-up after completion of treatment was 20.1 months, with 9 of 11 patients having a follow-up period of >12 months. Two patients had biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen >= 0.05) within the first 12 months, with an additional 2 patients found to have biochemical recurrence after the 12-month period. The highest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events genitourinary grades were 0, 1, 2, and 3 (n = 1, 4, 4, and 2, respectively), and the highest gastro-intestinal grades were 0, 1, and 2 (n = 9, 1, and 1, respectively). At 12 months, incontinence was the only grade >= 2 toxicity. One and 2 of 9 patients had grade 2 and 3 incontinence, respectively. On the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (26-item version), the mean/median changes in scores from baseline to 12 months were -32.8/-31.1 for urinary incontinence, -1.6/-6.2 for urinary irritative/obstructive, -2.1/0 for bowel, -34.4/-37.5 for sexual function, and -10.6/-2.5 for hormonal. The mean/median change in International Prostate Symptom Score from baseline to 12 months was 0.5/0.5. Conclusions: RP after neoadjuvant SBRT appears to be feasible and safe at the dose tested. The severity of urinary incontinence may be higher than RP alone. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 935
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Peng
    Cai, Shengyong
    Yan, Chengquan
    Li, Lin
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 38 (08) : 1 - 7
  • [32] Re: Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy in High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Pushkar, Dmitry
    Govorov, Alexander
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (01) : 144 - 145
  • [33] Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Westover, Kenneth
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Moul, Judd
    Robertson, Cary
    Polascik, Thomas
    Dosoretz, Daniel
    Katin, Michael
    Salenius, Sharon
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (08) : 1116 - 1121
  • [34] Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized prostate cancer: defining appropriate endpoints
    Oh, WK
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2003, 21 (03) : 229 - 234
  • [35] ARNEO: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Degarelix with or Without Apalutamide Prior to Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Devos, Gaetan
    Tosco, Lorenzo
    Baldewijns, Marcella
    Gevaert, Thomas
    Goffin, Karolien
    Petit, Valentin
    Mai, Cindy
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Raskin, Yannic
    Van Haute, Carl
    Goeman, Lieven
    De Meerleer, Gert
    Berghen, Charlien
    Devlies, Wout
    Claessens, Frank
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Joniau, Steven
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (06) : 508 - 518
  • [36] Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a mini-review
    Fan, Junjie
    Jiang, Zhangdong
    Wang, Guojing
    He, Dalin
    Wu, Kaijie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL UROLOGY, 2024, 12 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [37] Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel in High Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Shepard, D. R.
    Dreicer, R.
    Garcia, J.
    Elson, P.
    Magi-Galluzzi, C.
    Raghavan, D.
    Stephenson, A. J.
    Klein, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1672 - 1677
  • [38] Primary Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Decision Analysis
    Parikh, R. B.
    Sher, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S125 - S125
  • [39] Long-term oncological outcomes of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    Poon, Stephen A.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Maschino, Alexandra C.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Bernie, Aaron
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Kelly, W. Kevin
    Eastham, James A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [40] Adjuvant vs Salvage Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy
    MacDuffie, Emily
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (08) : 1165 - 1166