Multi-criteria Assessment Model of Technologies

被引:0
|
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
Volvaciovas, Robertas [1 ]
Kildiene, Simona [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL | 2013年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
MCDM; model; ELECTRE IV; MULTIMOORA; SWARA-TOPSIS; SWARA-ELECTRE III; SWARA-VIKOR; facades; thermal insulation; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; MOORA METHOD; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; REFURBISHMENT; CONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; MULTIMOORA; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Construction is a sector that accepts innovations slowly. Selection of effective technological systems in construction is a complex multi-criteria task. Many decision-makers refuse innovations once faced with similar difficulties. The article presents an original approach towards a development of multi-criteria assessment and ranking technique for alternatives of technology in construction. The problem was solved using different well-known MCDM methods ELECTRE IV and MULTIMOORA. Three hybrid methods SWARA-TOPSIS, SWARA-ELECTRE III, SWARA-VIKOR were used to solve the same problem. Priority of considered alternatives was determined based on the average of alternatives performance rank. The article presents a practical case study on evaluation of different alternatives for public buildings refurbishment using typical and novel thermal insulation technologies for facades. Research results demonstrate that novel facades thermal insulation alternatives for facades have a higher performance level than commonly used ones.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria assessment of pitched roof reconstruction technologies
    Kuznecov, Roman
    Saparauskas, Jonas
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES (MBMST 2019), 2019, : 617 - 624
  • [2] Multi-criteria assessment of small scale CHP technologies in buildings
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentis, Tomas
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 : 183 - 189
  • [3] Multi-criteria assessment model for farm reorientation
    Nikoloski, T.
    Udovc, A.
    Pavlovic, M.
    Rajkovic, U.
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2018, 27 : 79 - 87
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of tertiary wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria analysis
    Plakas, K. V.
    Georgiadis, A. A.
    Karabelas, A. J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 73 (07) : 1532 - 1540
  • [5] The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model
    Komuro, Rie
    Ford, E. David
    Reynolds, Joel H.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 197 (3-4) : 320 - 330
  • [6] A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies
    Stein, Eric W.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 22 : 640 - 654
  • [7] MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES - CASE STUDY: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY OF COMPOSTING
    Kubankova, Marie
    Nedelnik, Jan
    Raclavska, Helena
    Juchelkova, Dagmar
    Hejatkova, Kvetuse
    12TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2018, : 939 - 948
  • [8] Intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage technologies
    Zhang, Chonghui
    Chen, Chao
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentis, Tomas
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 79 : 410 - 423
  • [9] Probabilistic multi-criteria assessment of renewable micro-generation technologies in households
    Zhang, Chonghui
    Wang, Qin
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    Balezentis, Tomas
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Alisauskaite-Seskiene, Ilona
    Chen, Xueli
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 582 - 592
  • [10] MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE INTERMODAL TERMINAL TECHNOLOGIES
    Zacevic, Slobodan
    Tadic, Snezana
    Krstic, Mladen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2017, : 105 - 110