3D CISS, 3D MP-PAGE and 2D TSE for MRI prior to cochlear implantation.

被引:4
|
作者
Seitz, J [1 ]
Held, P
Waldeck, A
Völk, M
Lenhart, M
Strotzer, M
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg Klinikum, Inst Rontgendiagnost, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg Klinikum, Klin & Poliklin Hals Nasen Ohrenheilkunde, Regensburg, Germany
关键词
cochlear implant; Cl; inner ear; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; computed tomography; CT; cochlear nerve;
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-104
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the presurgical predictive value of high resolution MRI in patients scheduled for chochlear implantation. Method and Material: The presurgical MRI (3D CISS, 3D MP-RAGE with and without i.v. contrast medium, 2D TSE) findings of 54 patients and the intraoperative situation reported by the surgeon were compared retrospectively. The surgical and functional success of the cochlear implantation was evaluated. Results: We found a high degree of correlation between MRI and intraoperative findings concerning the patency of the whole cochlea and anomalies as well as in the diagnosis of pathology of the cochlear, vestibular and facial nerves and in anomalies of the internal auditory canal. However, in four out of 54 patients there was a false negative prediction regarding the patency of the cochlea. The sensitivity was 50% (4/8), the specificity 100% (46/46). Concerning the surgical success the accuracy was 100%. In all patients MRI gave sufficient anatomical information to the surgeon concerning the jugular bulb and the facial nerve. Conclusion: A high-resolution MRI protocol consisting of coronal 2D T2w TSE, 3D T2 * w transverse CISS; plain and contrast enhanced sagittal T1w 3D MP-RAGE is recommended for the evaluation of candidates scheduled for cochlear implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 231
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulations of 3D silicon radiation detector structures in 2D and 3D
    Kalliopuska, Juha
    Eranen, Simo
    Orava, Risto
    2005 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 803 - 807
  • [32] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58
  • [33] Monocular 3D Face Reconstruction with Joint 2D and 3D Constraints
    Cui, Huili
    Yang, Jing
    Lai, Yu-Kun
    Li, Kun
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, CICAI 2022, PT I, 2022, 13604 : 129 - 141
  • [34] A "LEARN 2D, APPLY 3D" METHOD FOR 3D DECONVOLUTION MICROSCOPY
    Soulez, Ferreol
    2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2014, : 1075 - 1078
  • [35] MARKOVIAN METHOD FOR 2D, 3D AND 4D SEGMENTATION OF MRI
    Jodoin, Pierre-Marc
    Lalande, Alain
    Voisin, Yvon
    Bouchot, Olivier
    Steinmetz, Eric
    2008 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 3012 - 3015
  • [36] 2D Amodal Instance Segmentation Guided by 3D Shape Prior
    Li, Zhixuan
    Ye, Weining
    Jiang, Tingting
    Huang, Tiejun
    COMPUTER VISION, ECCV 2022, PT XXIX, 2022, 13689 : 165 - 181
  • [37] 3D isotropic MRI of ankle: review of literature with comparison to 2D MRI
    Suryansh Bajaj
    Avneesh Chhabra
    Atul Kumar Taneja
    Skeletal Radiology, 2024, 53 : 825 - 846
  • [38] 3D MRI of the Wrist: Anatomy and Clinical Applications With Comparison to 2D MRI
    Bajaj, Suryansh
    Chhabra, Avneesh
    Taneja, Atul Kumar
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 59 (04) : 429 - 446
  • [39] The Overview of 2D to 3D Conversion
    Deng, Qingqing
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Shaobin
    2013 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS INFORMATION AND EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION (ICEIEC), 2014, : 226 - 229
  • [40] 3D Experience on a 2D Display
    Srinath, Raghunandan
    Aishwarya, P.
    Suman, B.
    Ramgopichand, V. N.
    Surabhi, N.
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI), 2021,