Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Strategic Retrieval Processing

被引:27
|
作者
Bridger, Emma K. [1 ]
Herron, Jane E. [1 ]
Elward, Rachael L. [1 ]
Wilding, Edward L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Brain Res Imaging Ctr, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
event-related potentials (ERPs); individual differences; strategic retrieval processing; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; MEMORY RETRIEVAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; EPISODIC RETRIEVAL; BRAIN POTENTIALS; ORIENTATION; RECOLLECTION; RECOGNITION; INDEXES; ERP;
D O I
10.1037/a0016375
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Processes engaged when information is encoded into memory are an important determinant of whether that information will be recovered subsequently. Also influential, however, are processes engaged at the time of retrieval, and these were investigated here by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure a specific class of retrieval operations. These operations were revealed by contrasts between ERPs elicited by new (unstudied) test items in distinct tasks, the assumption being that these contrasts index operations that are engaged in service of retrieval and that vary according to the demands of different retrieval tasks. Specific functional accounts of this class of retrieval processing operations assume that they influence the accuracy of memory judgments, and this experiment was designed to test for the first time whether this is in fact the case. Toward this end, participants completed 2 retrieval tasks while ERPs were acquired, and the extent to which processes were engaged differentially across tasks in service of retrieval was operationalized as the magnitude of the differences between the new-item ERPs that were elicited. This measure correlated positively with response accuracy on the tasks, which provides strong evidence that this class of retrieval processing operations benefits the accuracy of memory judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1186
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of working memory capacity in autobiographical retrieval: Individual differences in strategic search
    Unsworth, Nash
    Spillers, Gregory J.
    Brewer, Gene A.
    MEMORY, 2012, 20 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [22] Similarities and differences in the neural correlates of episodic memory retrieval and working memory
    Cabeza, R
    Dolcos, F
    Graham, R
    Nyberg, L
    NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) : 317 - 330
  • [23] Impaired memory retrieval correlates with individual differences in cortisol response but not autonomic response
    Buchanan, Tony W.
    Tranel, Daniel
    Adolphs, Ralph
    LEARNING & MEMORY, 2006, 13 (03) : 382 - 387
  • [24] Gender differences in the neural correlates of humor processing: Implications for different processing modes
    Kohn, N.
    Kellermann, T.
    Gur, R. C.
    Schneider, F.
    Habel, U.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (05) : 888 - 897
  • [25] Neural correlates of developmental differences in risk estimation and feedback processing
    van Leijenhorst, Linda
    Crone, Eveline A.
    Bunge, Silvia A.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (11) : 2158 - 2170
  • [26] Individual differences in cortical processing of affective faces: Heritability and behavioral correlates
    Anokhin, A. P.
    Golosheykin, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 207 - 208
  • [27] Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Infant Visual Attention and Recognition Memory
    Reynolds, Greg D.
    Guy, Maggie W.
    Zhang, Dantong
    INFANCY, 2011, 16 (04) : 368 - 391
  • [28] Neural correlates of individual differences in predicting ambiguous sounds comprehension level
    Lin, Yi
    Tsao, Yu
    Hsieh, Po-Jang
    NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 251
  • [29] Neural correlates of attentional control: Implications for individual differences in emotion regulation
    Henderson, Heather A.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 : S11 - S11
  • [30] On neural correlates of individual differences in novel grammar learning: An fMRI study
    Kepinska, Olga
    de Rover, Mischa
    Caspers, Johanneke
    Schiller, Niels O.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2017, 98 : 156 - 168