A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor

被引:2
|
作者
Waldron, Sarah [1 ]
Contziu, Hannah [1 ]
Aleshin, Olga [1 ]
Phipps, Hala [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, RPA Women & Babies, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney Inst Women Children & Families, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Susan Wakil Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY | 2022年 / 6卷
关键词
labor and birth; cervical ripening; pregnant women; induction of labor; double-balloon catheter; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; FOLEY CATHETER; OUTPATIENT; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; CERVIX;
D O I
10.18332/ejm/146689
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION Induction of labor (IOL) is rising globally and is growing steadily in the state of New South Wales, Australia. There are numerous methods of induction of labor, including the double balloon catheter (DBC). There is minimal evidence on women's attitudes and experiences and clinician's opinions on the use of the DBC. This study aims to explore the views regarding DBC insertion and effectiveness from women induced with a DBC and clinicians involved in the catheter insertion and care. METHODS This study is a descriptive survey of two prospective, de-identified, self-reported questionnaires which were completed in 2016. One questionnaire was administered to term pregnant women that were admitted to the antenatal ward post IOL, and the other was completed by midwives and obstetric doctors working in the ward at the time. RESULTS The DBC appeared to be a well-accepted method of cervical ripening among women (61%) and clinicians (>82%). Success of DBC to achieve an artificial rupture of membrane post removal, directly correlates to women's acceptance (61%). While most clinicians (59-67%) perceived insertion of DBC in an outpatient setting and then women discharged home was appropriate, only 13% of women were in favor. On the logistics of the procedure in respect to insertion and removal of the DBC, there were differences of opinion, with only 43% of women, 77% of midwives and 33% of doctors stating that the timing of insertion and removal needed to be improved. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the need to undertake qualitative research to further explore women's views and perceptions on IOL in order to ensure that clinical practice is woman-centered and evidenced-based, and to guide policy and protocol.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Du, Chuying
    Liu, Yukun
    Liu, Yinglin
    Ding, Hong
    Zhang, Rui
    Tan, Jianping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1221 - 1227
  • [32] Women's Experiences of Mechanical Balloon Catheter Induction With Self-Traction
    Landry, Isabelle
    Galipeau, Roseline
    Gervaise, Amelie
    Bohemier, Valerie
    Croteau, Diane
    Lebel, Valerie
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2024, 53 (05): : 562 - 571
  • [33] Mechanical Labor Induction Using the Foley Catheter Balloon Compared With the Cook Cervical Balloon
    Fuks, Aleksandr M.
    Robinson, Jenelle Vonetta
    Rothschild, Tod Jay
    Akinnawonu, Kolawole Felix
    Salafia, Carolyn
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 37S - 37S
  • [34] Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook’s Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term
    Hui Du
    Na Zhang
    Chan-yun Xiao
    Guo-qiang Sun
    Yun Zhao
    Current Medical Science, 2020, 40 : 951 - 959
  • [35] Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term
    Du, Hui
    Zhang, Na
    Xiao, Chan-yun
    Sun, Guo-qiang
    Zhao, Yun
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 40 (05) : 951 - 959
  • [36] Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method
    Obut, Mehmet
    Balsak, Deniz
    Sarsmaz, Kemal
    Tolunay, Harun E.
    Varli, Erol N.
    Sahin, Dilek
    Yucel, Aykan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 (03) : 496 - 504
  • [37] Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Fang
    Huang, Shijin
    Long, Yu
    Huang, Lingling
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [38] Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review
    Greenberg, Victoria
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 441 - 443
  • [39] The effectivity of balloon catheter for labor induction in post-term pregnancy
    Sulchan, S
    Risanto, S
    Lisnur, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF 54TH ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, : 59 - 65
  • [40] BALLOON CATHETER ENHANCED INDUCTION OF LABOR IN THE PRESENCE OF ABNORMAL FETAL CARDIOTOCOGRAM
    SEMCHYSHYN, S
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1986, 9 (03): : A70 - A70