Demand response of district heating using model predictive control to prevent the draught risk of cold window in an office building

被引:27
|
作者
Wu, Yuxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maki, Aleksi [4 ]
Jokisalo, Juha [1 ]
Kosonen, Risto [1 ,5 ]
Kilpelainen, Simo [1 ]
Salo, Sonja [1 ,6 ]
Liu, Hong [2 ]
Li, Baizhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Espoo 02150, Finland
[2] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[4] Granlund Consulting Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Urban Construct, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
[6] Fourdeg Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Demand response; Thermal comfort; Model predictive control; Thermal manikin; Optimization; THERMAL COMFORT; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; HOT SUMMER; OPTIMIZATION; CLIMATE; MANNEQUIN; SENSATION; SYSTEMS; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101855
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Demand response of district heating provides one tool for decreasing cost and emissions in the whole energy system. However, when seeking cost savings and emission reductions, it is also important to consider thermal comfort. Thus, the overall and local thermal comfort of occupants were investigated during the experimental study while applying the demand response of space heating. Thermal manikin measurements were used to reveal the draught risk of convection flow caused by cold windows. Results show that when the surface temperature of windows was below 15 degrees C while the thermostat valves of the radiators were closed, the draught risk became unacceptable. The main objective of the simulation with the developed predictive control algorithm (MPC) was to show how much the minimization of draught risk by limiting minimum window surface temperature to 15 degrees C during decentralized demand response control effects heating energy cost-saving potential. Results show the maximum annual district heat energy cost saving by demand response control without minimization of draught risk is 4.8% and 3.8% with energy-efficient (U = 1.0 W/m(2)K) or poor (U = 2.6 W/m(2)K) windows respectively, but the draught risk is high with the poor windows. The minimization of draught risk has an insignificant effect on the cost-saving with the energy-efficient windows, but the cost-saving was reduced to 2.3% and draught risk significantly decreased with the poor windows. Thus, it is necessary to use the window temperature restriction with demand response control of radiator heating to prevent the draught risk of cold poorly insulated windows within the thermal comfort range.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Development of a Framework for Model Predictive Control (MPC) in a Large-Sized Low-Energy Office Building Using Modelica Grey-Box Models
    Freund, Svenne
    Schmitz, Gerhard
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF BUILDING SIMULATION 2019: 16TH CONFERENCE OF IBPSA, 2020, : 2864 - 2871
  • [42] Demand response of an Electric Vehicle charging station using a robust-explicit model predictive control considering uncertainties to minimize carbon intensity
    Cabrera-Tobar, Ana
    Blasuttigh, Nicola
    Pavan, Alessandro Massi
    Spagnuolo, Giovanni
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2024, 38
  • [43] Real-Time Solar Power Generation Scheduling for Maintenance and Suboptimally Performing Equipment Using Demand Response Unified with Model Predictive Control
    Li, Bin
    Fesseha, Samrawit Bzayene
    Chen, Songsong
    Zhou, Ying
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (13)
  • [44] Influence of thermal energy storage and heat pump parametrization for demand-side-management in a nearly-zero-energy-building using model predictive control
    Bechtel, Steffen
    Rafii-Tabrizi, Sasan
    Scholzen, Frank
    Hadji-Minaglou, Jean-Regis
    Maas, Stefan
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 226