Demand response of district heating using model predictive control to prevent the draught risk of cold window in an office building

被引:27
|
作者
Wu, Yuxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maki, Aleksi [4 ]
Jokisalo, Juha [1 ]
Kosonen, Risto [1 ,5 ]
Kilpelainen, Simo [1 ]
Salo, Sonja [1 ,6 ]
Liu, Hong [2 ]
Li, Baizhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Espoo 02150, Finland
[2] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[4] Granlund Consulting Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Urban Construct, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
[6] Fourdeg Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Demand response; Thermal comfort; Model predictive control; Thermal manikin; Optimization; THERMAL COMFORT; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; HOT SUMMER; OPTIMIZATION; CLIMATE; MANNEQUIN; SENSATION; SYSTEMS; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101855
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Demand response of district heating provides one tool for decreasing cost and emissions in the whole energy system. However, when seeking cost savings and emission reductions, it is also important to consider thermal comfort. Thus, the overall and local thermal comfort of occupants were investigated during the experimental study while applying the demand response of space heating. Thermal manikin measurements were used to reveal the draught risk of convection flow caused by cold windows. Results show that when the surface temperature of windows was below 15 degrees C while the thermostat valves of the radiators were closed, the draught risk became unacceptable. The main objective of the simulation with the developed predictive control algorithm (MPC) was to show how much the minimization of draught risk by limiting minimum window surface temperature to 15 degrees C during decentralized demand response control effects heating energy cost-saving potential. Results show the maximum annual district heat energy cost saving by demand response control without minimization of draught risk is 4.8% and 3.8% with energy-efficient (U = 1.0 W/m(2)K) or poor (U = 2.6 W/m(2)K) windows respectively, but the draught risk is high with the poor windows. The minimization of draught risk has an insignificant effect on the cost-saving with the energy-efficient windows, but the cost-saving was reduced to 2.3% and draught risk significantly decreased with the poor windows. Thus, it is necessary to use the window temperature restriction with demand response control of radiator heating to prevent the draught risk of cold poorly insulated windows within the thermal comfort range.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Demand response potential of district heating and ventilation in an educational office building
    Vand, Behrang
    Martin, Kristian
    Jokisalo, Juha
    Kosonen, Risto
    Hast, Aira
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 26 (03) : 304 - 319
  • [2] Cost-Effective Heating Control Approaches by Demand Response and Peak Demand Limiting in an Educational Office Building with District Heating
    Yuan, Xiaolei
    Vand, Behrang
    Martin, Kristian
    Jokisalo, Juha
    Liang, Yumin
    Kosonen, Risto
    Pan, Yiqun
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [3] Demand-response in building heating systems: A Model Predictive Control approach
    Bianchini, Gianni
    Casini, Marco
    Vicino, Antonio
    Zarrilli, Donato
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 168 : 159 - 170
  • [4] Demand Response with Model Predictive Comfort Compliance in an Office Building
    Nelleman, Peter
    Kjaergaard, Mikkel Baun
    Holmegaard, Emil
    Arendt, Krzysztof
    Johansen, Aslak
    Sangogboye, Fisayo Caleb
    Jorgensen, Bo Norregaard
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID COMMUNICATIONS (SMARTGRIDCOMM), 2017, : 351 - 356
  • [5] Benefits through Space Heating and Thermal Storage with Demand Response Control for a District-Heated Office Building
    Ju, Yuchen
    Hiltunen, Pauli
    Jokisalo, Juha
    Kosonen, Risto
    Syri, Sanna
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (10)
  • [6] Individual temperature control on demand response in a district heated office building in Finland
    Salo, Sonja
    Jokisalo, Juha
    Syri, Sanna
    Kosonen, Risto
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 180 : 946 - 954
  • [7] Price-responsive model predictive control of floor heating systems for demand response using building thermal mass
    Hu, Maomao
    Xiao, Fu
    Jorgensen, John Bagterp
    Li, Rongling
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 153 : 316 - 329
  • [8] Model predictive control for building active demand response systems
    Lauro, Fiorella
    Moretti, Fabio
    Capozzoli, Alfonso
    Panzieri, Stefano
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE SEB-15, 2015, 83 : 494 - 503
  • [9] Optimal Demand Response in a building by Battery and HVAC scheduling using Model Predictive Control
    Vedullapalli, Divya T.
    Hadidi, Ramtin
    Schroeder, Bill
    Baumgartner, Ryan
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/IAS 55TH INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONFERENCE (I&CPS), 2019, : 289 - 294
  • [10] Effects on district heating networks by introducing demand side economic model predictive control
    Hakansson, Henrik
    Onnheim, Magnus
    Gustavsson, Emil
    Jirstrand, Mats
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 309