Straight deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery: Safe and effective

被引:88
|
作者
Ziganshin, Bulat A. [1 ,2 ]
Rajbanshi, Bijoy G. [1 ,3 ]
Tranquilli, Maryann [1 ]
Fang, Hai [4 ]
Rizzo, John A. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Elefteriades, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale New Haven Hosp, Aort Inst, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Kazan State Med Univ, Dept Surg Dis 2, Kazan, Russia
[3] Shahid Gangalal Natl Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] Peking Univ, China Ctr Hlth Dev Studies, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Econ, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[6] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
来源
关键词
BRAIN PROTECTION; REPLACEMENT; PERFUSION; DETERMINANTS; PRESERVATION; EXPERIENCE; MORTALITY; ANEURYSMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate our extensive clinical experience using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) as a sole method of cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery, with an emphasis on determining the safe duration of DHCA. Methods: A total of 490 consecutive patients (303 males [61.8%], mean age, 62.7 +/- 13.5 years) underwent surgical interventions on the aortic arch with straight DHCA for cerebral protection. Of the procedures, 65 (13.3%) were either urgent or emergency. Aortic aneurysms (n = 417, 85.1%) and dissections (n = 71, 14.5%) were the main indications for surgery. Results: The mean DHCA duration was 29.2 +/- 7.9 minutes at a mean bladder temperature of 18.7 degrees C. The overall mortality was 2.4% (12 of 490), and elective mortality was 1.4% (6 of 425). The seizure rate was 1.4% (7 of 490). Six patients (1.2%) developed renal failure that required dialysis. The postoperative stroke rate was 1.6% (8 of 490) and was 1.2% (5 of 425) for the elective cases. The overall stroke rate for patients requiring <50 minutes of DHCA was 1.3% (6 of 478), significantly different from the 16.7% (2 of 12) stroke rate for patients requiring >50 minutes of DHCA (P = .014). Multivariate analysis revealed a DHCA time >50 minutes (odds ratio, 5.11 +/- 4.01, P = .038) and aortic dissection (odds ratio, 3.59 +/- 1.72, P = .008) to be strong predictors of composite adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Straight DHCA is a safe and effective technique of cerebral protection for the absolute majority of interventions involving the aortic arch. At experienced centers, up to 50 minutes of DHCA can be considered safe, without significant postoperative mortality or neurologic sequelae.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 898
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The neurologic protection of unilateral versus bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: A study of 77 cases
    Li, Bowen
    Hu, Xiaoping
    Wang, Zhiwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 40 : 8 - 13
  • [22] Aortic arch reconstruction: deep and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion
    Wu, YanWen
    Xiao, LiQiong
    Yang, Ting
    Wang, Lei
    Chen, Xin
    PERFUSION-UK, 2017, 32 (05): : 389 - 393
  • [23] Cerebral autoregulation after hypothermic circulatory arrest in operations on the aortic arch
    Neri, E
    Sassi, C
    Barabesi, L
    Massetti, M
    Pula, G
    Buklas, D
    Tassi, R
    Giomarelli, P
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (01): : 72 - 79
  • [24] Aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest and unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion: Perioperative outcomes
    Wang, Xiaomeng
    Yang, Feng
    Zhu, Junming
    Liu, Yongmin
    Sun, Lizhong
    Hou, Xiaotong
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 159 (02): : 374 - +
  • [25] Surgery of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion and open technique
    Aomi, S
    Niinami, H
    Nozi, S
    Uwabe, K
    Kihara, S
    Kurihara, T
    Endo, M
    Koyanagi, H
    CARDIO-AORTIC AND AORTIC SURGERY, 2001, 7 : 99 - 104
  • [26] Is there a need for adjunct cerebral protection in conjunction with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during noncomplex hemiarch surgery?
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Aranki, Sary F.
    Neely, Robert C.
    Yazdchi, Farhang
    McGurk, Siobhan
    Leacche, Marzia
    Shekar, Prem S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 148 (06): : 2911 - 2917
  • [27] Favorable late survival after aortic surgery under straight deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
    Damberg, Anneke
    Carino, Davide
    Charilaou, Paris
    Peterss, Sven
    Tranquilli, Maryann
    Ziganshin, Bulat A.
    Rizzo, John A.
    Elefteriades, John A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 154 (06): : 1831 - +
  • [28] A modified procedure in aortic arch replacement with no deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
    Li, Yong
    Sun, Xiaogang
    Zhang, Xiuhui
    Zhang, Yuchun
    Pang, Guanghui
    Ma, Hongliang
    PERFUSION-UK, 2018, 33 (08): : 663 - 666
  • [29] Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest for Aortic Arch Replacement
    Schaefers, H. -J.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2014, 28 (04): : 275 - 276
  • [30] Duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic arch surgery: is it a myth, fiction, or scientific leap?
    Tan, Sven Z.
    Singh, Sidhant
    Austin, Natasha J.
    Alfonso Palanca, Joaquin
    Jubouri, Matti
    Girardi, Leonard N.
    Chen, Edward P.
    Bashir, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (03): : 243 - 253