Near-universal hospitalization of US emergency department patients with cancer and febrile neutropenia

Importance Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common oncologic emergency and is among the most deadly. Guidelines recommend risk stratification and outpatient management of both pediatric and adult FN patients deemed to be at low risk of complications or mortality, but our prior single-center research demonstrated that the vast majority (95%) are hospitalized. Objective From a nationwide perspective, to determine the proportion of cancer patients of all ages hospitalized after an emergency department (ED) visit for FN, and to analyze variability in hospitalization rates. Our a priori hypothesis was that >90% of US cancer-associated ED FN visits would end in hospitalization. Design Analysis of data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, 2006-2014. Setting Stratified probability sample of all US ED visits. Participants Inclusion criteria were: (1) Clinical Classification Software code indicating cancer, (2) diagnostic code indicating fever, and (3) diagnostic code indicating neutropenia. We excluded visits ending in transfer. Exposure The hospital at which the visit took place. Main outcomes and measures Our main outcome is the proportion of ED FN visits ending in hospitalization, with an a priori hypothesis of >90%. Our secondary outcomes are: ( a) hospitalization rates among subsets, and ( b) proportion of variability in the hospitalization rate attributable to which hospital the patient visited, as measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient ( ICC). Results Of 348,868 visits selected to be representative of all US ED visits, 94% ended in hospitalization ( 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 93-94%). Each additional decade of age conferred 1.23x increased odds of hospitalization. Those with private ( 92%), self-pay ( 92%), and other ( 93%) insurance were less likely to be hospitalized than those with public insurance ( 95%, odds ratios [OR] 0.74-0.76). Hospitalization was least likely at non-metropolitan hospitals ( 84%, OR 0.15 relative to metropolitan teaching hospitals), and was also less likely at metropolitan non-teaching hospitals ( 94%, OR 0.64 relative to metropolitan teaching hospitals). The ICC adjusted for hospital random effects and patient and hospital characteristics was 26% ( 95% CI 23-29%), indicating that 26% of the variability in hospitalization rate was attributable to which hospital the patient visited. Conclusions and relevance Nearly all cancer-associated ED FN visits in the US end in hospitalization. Inter-hospital variation in hospitalization practices explains 26% of the limited variability in hospitalization decisions. Simple, objective tools are needed to improve risk stratification for ED FN patients.