Resource assessment of the Copahue geothermal field

被引:15
|
作者
Barcelona, Hernan [1 ]
Senger, Martin [2 ]
Yagupsky, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Estudios Andinos, CONICET IDEAN, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Geneva, Dept Earth Sci, Earth & Environm Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Copahue geothermal project; Volumetric method; Montecarlo simulation; Wellhead power output; CAVIAHUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101987
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper assesses the electrical generating capacity of the Copahue geothermal field. Because it plays a critical role in driving financial support, we discuss these results in terms of its geothermal project. We performed a set of estimates, including the volumetric method and wellhead output calculations. The former was supported by a 3D-geological model that allowed us to subdivide the reservoir into blocks to constraint the parameters to each zone better. The probability models estimate that the proved resource can produce more than 10.2 MWe and 13.5 MWe at 90 % and 50 % confidence level, respectively. The wellhead power output calculations were supported by long- and shortperiod discharge test performed at three production wells and one slim hole and by the analysis of its decline paths. We estimate 10 MWe in the most optimistic prediction ruling out the identified power plant decline, above 5 % per year. Regardless of the method, our results support less than half of the previously calculated proven power output (i.e., 30 MWe) used to scale the offered tenders to develop a power plant. Overestimation cases worldwide invite us to be even more restricted over our power capacity estimations. Moreover, a tighter characterization of the reservoir volume (e.g., Chilean ranking) could redefine it from proven to probable, increasing the uncertainty over the resource. Throughout its 50 years of history the Copahue Geothermal Project reached significant milestones (first power plant on South America, a district -heating system, and four drilled wells). However, an in-depth review of the project history revealed several setbacks (closure of the power generation and direct use projects because of technical issues, developer retreatments, inadequate tenders) that partially explain its current on-hold status. We concluded that more work is needed before advancing towards the development stage of the project. The vast heat storage at Copahue is beyond doubt, but it is mandatory to improve the estimations of the steam supply, enhance the success rate of wells by a new drilling exploration stage, resize the projected power plant and perform a more accurate feasibility report. New attempts to attract investors and future developers should consider these goals and the project history to avoid new setbacks.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Microbial diversity in acidic anaerobic sediments at the geothermal Caviahue-Copahue system, Argentina
    Willis, Graciana
    Hedrich, Sabrina
    Nancucheo, Ivan
    Johnson, D. Barrie
    Donati, Edgardo
    INTEGRATION OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL KNOWLEDGE ON BIOHYDROMETALLURGY, 2013, 825 : 7 - +
  • [42] Petrogenesis of high heat producing granites and their contribution to geothermal resource in the Huangshadong geothermal field, South China
    Liao, Yuzhong
    Wang, Guiling
    Xi, Yufei
    Gan, Haonan
    Yan, Xiaoxue
    Yu, Mingxiao
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhao, Zirui
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [43] Anthropogenic Pollution Assessment of Pertek (Tunceli) Geothermal Field
    Balaban, Tugbanur Ozen
    Okan, Ozlem Oztekin
    Sancar, Taylan
    Onal, Ayten Oztufekci
    TURKIYE JEOLOJI BULTENI-GEOLOGICAL BULLETIN OF TURKEY, 2020, 63 (01): : 83 - 96
  • [44] Geothermal resource and reserve assessment methodology: Overview, analysis and future directions
    Ciriaco, Anthony E.
    Zarrouk, Sadiq J.
    Zakeri, Golbon
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 119
  • [45] Geothermal resource exploration
    Wollenberg, Harold A.
    Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, 1982, 189 : 375 - 386
  • [46] GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS
    PORTER, LR
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1975, 101 (NHY4): : 409 - 410
  • [47] Oxidative capacity of native strains from Copahue geothermal system in the pretreatment of a gold sulfide ore
    Giaveno, A.
    Chiacchiarini, P.
    Cordero, C.
    Lavalle, L.
    Huergo, J.
    Donati, E.
    BIOHYDROMETALLURGY: A MEETING POINT BETWEEN MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, METAL RECOVERY PROCESSES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, 2009, 71-73 : 473 - +
  • [48] Structural model and slip-dilation tendency analysis at the Copahue geothermal system: Inferences on the reservoir geometry
    Barcelona, Hernan
    Yagupsky, Daniel
    Vigide, Nicolas
    Senger, Martin
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2019, 375 : 18 - 31
  • [49] Assessment of geothermal water quality for industrial and irrigation purposes in the Unai geothermal field, Gujarat, India
    Shah, Manan
    Sircar, Anirbid
    Varsada, Rajan
    Vaishnani, Sweta
    Savaliya, Uttam
    Faldu, Meet
    Vaidya, Dwijen
    Bhattacharya, Prosun
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 8 : 59 - 68
  • [50] Arsenic speciation and trace element analysis of the volcanic rio Agrio and the geothermal waters of Copahue, Argentina
    Farnfield, Hannah R.
    Marcilla, Andrea L.
    Ward, Neil I.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 433 : 371 - 378