Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems

被引:132
|
作者
Afgan, NH [1 ]
Carvalho, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
sustainability index; multi-criteria assessment; hydrogen energy systems; indicators; natural gas turbine; photovoltaic system; wind energy system;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.01.005
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper gives an overview of the potential on multi-criteria assessment of hydrogen systems. With respective selection of the criteria comprising performance, environment, market and social indicators the assessment procedure is adapted for the assessment of the selected options of the hydrogen energy systems and their comparison with new and renewable energy systems. The single parameter assessment for each indicator is demonstrated as the traditional approach in the evaluation of the option under consideration which reflects a biased result depending on the selected indicator. In order to apply the multi-criteria approach to the hydrogen systems, it was necessary to use the multi-criteria procedure based on the sustainability index rating composed of linear aggregative functions of all indicators with respective weighting function. The example under consideration are hydrogen fuel cell systems with three options including natural gas turbine, photovoltaic and wind energy systems representing different renewable power plant option. These options are evaluated with the multi-criteria method comprising the following indicators: performance indicator, market indicator, environment indicator and social indicator. The indicators are composed of a number of sub-indicators agglomerated in respective indicators. The evaluation of options under consideration was performed under constraint expressing non-numeric relation among the indicators. The group comprises cases when priority is given to a single indicator and other indicators have the same value. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1342
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Energy Sustainability in Statistical Regions of Latvia using Energy Sustainability Index
    Slisane, Dzintra
    Gaumigs, Gatis
    Lauka, Dace
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (02) : 160 - 169
  • [32] Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production by steam reforming
    Tugnoli, Alessandro
    Landucci, Gabriele
    Cozzani, Valerio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (16) : 4345 - 4357
  • [33] Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators
    Afgan, NH
    Carvalho, MG
    Hovanov, NV
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) : 603 - 612
  • [34] Sustainability assessment of the German energy transition
    Roesch, Christine
    Braeutigam, Klaus-Rainer
    Kopfmueller, Juergen
    Stelzer, Volker
    Fricke, Annika
    [J]. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 8
  • [35] Sustainability assessment of biomass energy utilization
    [J]. Kudoh, Yuki, 1600, Nat. Inst. of Adv. Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
  • [36] Sustainability assessment of the German energy transition
    Christine Rösch
    Klaus-Rainer Bräutigam
    Jürgen Kopfmüller
    Volker Stelzer
    Annika Fricke
    [J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8
  • [37] Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system
    Afgan, Nain H.
    Carvalho, Maria G.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (08) : 2903 - 2910
  • [38] Energy sustainability: a definition and assessment model
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    Kouikoglou, Vassilis S.
    Phillis, Yannis A.
    Kanellos, Fotis D.
    [J]. OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (03) : 1845 - 1885
  • [39] Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen energy system in sustainability perspective (Adaptability to the vehicle fuel)
    Otake, Tsuyoshi
    Nagashima, Akira
    [J]. Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, B Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, 2004, 70 (694): : 1610 - 1617
  • [40] Energy sustainability: a definition and assessment model
    Evangelos Grigoroudis
    Vassilis S. Kouikoglou
    Yannis A. Phillis
    Fotis D. Kanellos
    [J]. Operational Research, 2021, 21 : 1845 - 1885