Pest management implications of glyphosate-resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the western United States

被引:0
|
作者
Lyon, DJ
Bussan, AJ
Evans, JO
Mallory-Smith, CA
Peeper, TF
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Panhandle Res & Extens Ctr, Scottsbluff, NE 69361 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Hort, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Plants Soils & Biometeorol Dept, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[4] Oregon State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
herbicide-resistant crops; wheat streak mosaic virus;
D O I
10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0680:PMIOGR]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Glyphosate-resistant crop species have increased in number over the past decade as growers eagerly adopt this simple and effective weed management technology. Glyphosate-resistant wheat cultivars are being developed and may soon be available to growers. The objective of this paper is to discuss the pest management implications of glyphosate-resistant wheat in the western United States, a region stretching from the Great Plains to the Pacific Ocean that produces more than 80% of the nation's wheat crop. The benefits of glyphosate-resistant wheat include: (1) improved weed control, particularly of difficult-to-control weeds, such as winter annual grasses belonging to the Aegilops, Avena, Bromus, Lolium, Poa, Secale, and Setaria genera; (2) an ability to control weeds resistant to currently available wheat herbicides; (3) an extended application window for control of late-emerging weeds; and (4) improved crop safety. Although these benefits are not to be minimized, they need to be considered in the light of the concerns surrounding this new technology in wheat. These concerns are about (1) the lack of an equally effective and affordable herbicide to control glyphosate-resistant volunteer wheat, which may increase wheat diseases such as wheat streak mosaic and Rhizoctonia root rot; (2) the possibility that overreliance on glyphosate will lead to species shifts, with unknown consequences for weed management in wheat; and (3) the use of multiple glyphosate-resistant crops in rotation With glyphosate-resistant wheat, which could rapidly increase glyphosate-resistant weeds, thereby limiting the future utility of glyphosate. If, or when, glyphosate-resistant wheat becomes commercially available, it will require careful management to sustain its usefulness. We have proposed several areas of research that we feel are critical to help develop sound management guidelines for deployment and use of this new weed management technology in wheat. These include (1) developing effective "green bridge" management strategies, i.e., using cultural and chemical approaches to control plants that sustain insect vector populations between wheat crop periods; (2) predicting potential weed species shifts resulting from the use of glyphosate-resistant wheat; and (3) developing management systems that include herbicide-resistant wheat on a rotational basis and rotating the use of glyphosate with other weed management strategies in the fallow period to minimize the potential development of glyphosate-resistant weeds or weed communities.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 690
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Earthworms, Collembola and residue management change wheat (Triticum aestivum) and herbivore pest performance (Aphidina: Rhophalosiphum padi)
    Xin Ke
    Stefan Scheu
    Oecologia, 2008, 157 : 603 - 617
  • [42] Earthworms, Collembola and residue management change wheat (Triticum aestivum) and herbivore pest performance (Aphidina: Rhophalosiphum padi)
    Ke, Xin
    Scheu, Stefan
    OECOLOGIA, 2008, 157 (04) : 603 - 617
  • [43] Effect of preharvest glyphosate application on seed and seedling quality of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)
    Yenish, JP
    Young, FL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 212 - 217
  • [44] Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 5: Effects of glyphosate-based weed management programs on farm-level profitability
    Weirich, Jason W.
    Shaw, David R.
    Owen, Micheal D. K.
    Dixon, Philip M.
    Weller, Stephen C.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Wilson, Robert G.
    Jordan, David L.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 67 (07) : 781 - 784
  • [45] The economic value of glyphosate-resistant canola in the management of two widespread crop weeds in a Western Australian farming system
    Monjardino, M
    Pannell, DJ
    Powles, SB
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 84 (03) : 297 - 315
  • [46] Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)
    Gonzini, LC
    Hart, SE
    Wax, LM
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 354 - 360
  • [47] Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: An Indiana, grower perspective
    Johnson, William G.
    Gibson, Kevin D.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) : 768 - 772
  • [48] Management of Large, Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Corn
    Crow, Whitney D.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    Hayes, Robert M.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 611 - 616
  • [49] Weed management systems for conventional and glyphosate-resistant soybean with and without irrigation
    Heatherly, LG
    Elmore, CD
    Spurlock, SR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (06) : 1419 - 1428
  • [50] Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays)
    Johnson, WG
    Bradley, PR
    Hart, SE
    Buesinger, ML
    Massey, RE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 57 - 65