Editosome RNase III domain interactions are essential for editing and differ between life cycle stages in Trypanosoma brucei

被引:10
|
作者
Mcdermott, Suzanne M. [1 ]
Carnes, Jason [1 ]
Stuart, Kenneth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Global Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RNA editing; trypanosomes; RNase III; mitochondria; endonuclease; developmental regulation; MITOCHONDRIAL BIOGENESIS; DISTINCT EDITOSOMES; PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE; ASSOCIATION; EXPRESSION; GENE; PCR; IDENTIFICATION; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1261/rna.071258.119
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Multiprotein editosomes catalyze gRNA-specified insertion and deletion of uridines to create functional mitochondrial mRNAs in Trypanosome brucei. Three functionally distinct editosomes are distinguished by their single KREN1, KREN2, or KREN3 RNase III endonuclease and, respectively, KREPB8, KREPB7, and KREPB6 partner proteins. These endonucleases perform the first catalytic step of editing, cleaving mRNA in diverse mRNA/gRNA heteroduplex substrates. We identified divergent and likely noncatalytic RNase III domains in KREPB4, KREPB5, KREPB6, KREPB7, KREPB8, KREPB9, and KREPB10 editosome proteins. Because known RNase III endonuclease functional domains are dimeric, the editing endonucleases may form heterodimers with one or more of these divergent RNase III proteins. We show here using conditional null cell lines that KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 are essential in both procyclic form (PF) and bloodstream (BF) cells. Loss of these proteins results in growth defects and loss of editing in vivo, as does mutation of their RNase III domain that is predicted to prevent dimerization. Loss of KREPB6, KREPB7, or KREPB8 also dramatically reduces cognate endonuclease abundance, as does the RNase III mutation, indicating that RNase III interactions with their partner proteins stabilize the endonucleases. The phenotypic consequences of repression are more severe in BF than in PF, indicating differences in endonuclease function between developmental stages that could impact regulation of editing. These results suggest that KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 form heterodimers with their respective endonucleases to perform mRNA cleavage. We also present a model wherein editosome proteins with divergent RNase III domains function in substrate selection via enzyme-pseudoenzyme interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1163
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] The hnRNP F/H homologue of Trypanosoma brucei is differentially expressed in the two life cycle stages of the parasite and regulates splicing and mRNA stability
    Gupta, Sachin Kumar
    Kosti, Idit
    Plaut, Guy
    Pivko, Asher
    Tkacz, Itai Dov
    Cohen-Chalamish, Smadar
    Biswas, Dipul Kumar
    Wachtel, Chaim
    Ben-Asher, Hiba Waldman
    Carmi, Shai
    Glaser, Fabian
    Mandel-Gutfreund, Yael
    Michaeli, Shulamit
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (13) : 6577 - 6594
  • [22] A pyruvate-proton symport and an H+-ATPase regulate the intracellular pH of Trypanosoma brucei at different stages of its life cycle
    Vanderheyden, N
    Wong, J
    Docampo, R
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 346 : 53 - 62
  • [23] Genome-wide analysis of mRNA abundance in two life-cycle stages of Trypanosoma brucei and identification of splicing and polyadenylation sites
    Siegel, Tim Nicolai
    Hekstra, Doeke R.
    Wang, Xuning
    Dewell, Scott
    Cross, George A. M.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (15) : 4946 - 4957
  • [24] Distinct Roles of a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Cytokinesis between Different Life Cycle Forms of Trypanosoma brucei
    Wei, Ying
    Li, Ziyin
    EUKARYOTIC CELL, 2014, 13 (01) : 110 - 118
  • [25] A 10 base-pair sequence within Domain III of the GPEET procyclin promoter is essential for the autonomous replication of a plasmid in procyclic Trypanosoma brucei
    Espinal, Amin
    Quijano, Jedidiah
    Hunt, Charleen
    Lorenzo, Robert
    Mulligan, Christopher
    Sampson, Mario
    Sauchelli, Mark
    Patnaik, Pradeep K.
    MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY, 2007, 151 (02) : 224 - 228
  • [26] Analyses of the essential C82 subunit uncovered some differences in RNA polymerase III transcription between Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major
    Cano-Santiago, Andres
    Florencio-Martinez, Luis E.
    Velez-Ramirez, Daniel E.
    Romero-Chaveste, Adrian J.
    Manning-Cela, Rebeca G.
    Nepomuceno-Mejia, Tomas
    Martinez-Calvillo, Santiago
    PARASITOLOGY, 2024,
  • [27] RNA-Seq analysis validates the use of culture-derived Trypanosoma brucei and provides new markers for mammalian and insect life-cycle stages
    Naguleswaran, Arunasalam
    Doiron, Nicholas
    Roditi, Isabel
    BMC GENOMICS, 2018, 19
  • [28] Comparative Proteomics of Two Life Cycle Stages of Stable Isotope-labeled Trypanosoma brucei Reveals Novel Components of the Parasite's Host Adaptation Machinery
    Butter, Falk
    Bucerius, Ferdinand
    Michel, Margaux
    Cicova, Zdenka
    Mann, Matthias
    Janzen, Christian J.
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2013, 12 (01) : 172 - 179
  • [29] RNA-Seq analysis validates the use of culture-derived Trypanosoma brucei and provides new markers for mammalian and insect life-cycle stages
    Arunasalam Naguleswaran
    Nicholas Doiron
    Isabel Roditi
    BMC Genomics, 19
  • [30] A pyruvate-proton symport and an H+-ATPase regulate the intracellular pH of Trypanosoma brucei at different stages of its life cycle (vol 346, pg 53, 2000)
    Vanderheyden, N
    Wong, J
    Docampo, R
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 347 (pt 3) : 887 - 887