Cesarean section as a result of unsuccessfull Labor induction

被引:0
|
作者
Plesinac, S. [1 ]
Plecas, D. [1 ]
Babovic, I. [1 ]
Karapandzic, V. Plesinac [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Ctr Serbia, Inst Gynecol & Obstet, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
prostaglandin; labor induction; cesarean section;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of the study was to show the incidence of cesarean section during unsuccessful labor inductions in 2004 at Institute of gynecology and obstetrics Clinical Center of Serbia. Materials and methods: The patients were divided in three groups. Group I included 81 patient whose labor was inducted with PGE1. Group II 210 patients where we used PGE2 and group III 44 patients where we used oxytocin. Results: The most frequent indication for induction was prolonged pregnancy (50%) and hypertension in pregnancy (11%). The average duration of labor was 8.6 hours in group I, 5.9 hours in group II and 10.4 hours in group III. The incidence of cesarean sections was 13.5% in group 1, 0.9% in group II and 87% in group III. Conclusion: PGE2 still remains the most reliable way of labor induction.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elective induction of labor in multiparous women - Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg, EM
    Wood, RA
    Chambers, RB
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (05) : 399 - 403
  • [32] Ultrasound detection of nuchal cord prior to labor induction and the risk of Cesarean section
    Peregrine, E
    O'Brien, P
    Jauniaux, E
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (02) : 160 - 164
  • [33] Effectiveness and safety of different methods for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section
    Huisman, Claartje
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Duvekot, Hans
    van Eyck, Jim
    Gaugler, Ingrid
    Franssen, Maureen
    van Gemund, Nicolette
    Heres, Marion
    Langenveld, Josje
    de Leeuw, Jan Willem
    Lohuis, Eefje Oude
    Oudijk, Martijn
    Papatsonis, Dimitri
    van Pampus, Marielle
    Porath, Martina
    van der Salm, Paulien
    Scheepers, Liesbeth
    Sikkema, Marko
    Sporken, Jan
    Stigter, Rob
    van Wijngaarden, Wim
    Woiski, Mallory
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S333 - S334
  • [34] LABOR INDUCTION FOR PLANNED VAGINAL DELIVERY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION
    LAO, TT
    LEUNG, BFH
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 66 (05) : 413 - 416
  • [35] Risk factors for cesarean section after using the Foley catheter for labor induction
    Beta, Jaroslaw
    Issat, Tadeusz
    Nowicka, Malgorzata A.
    Jakimiuk, Artur J.
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2013, 84 (05) : 359 - 362
  • [36] Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor
    Antonio Hernández-Martínez
    Ana I. Pascual-Pedreño
    Ana B. Baño-Garnés
    María R. Melero-Jiménez
    José M. Tenías-Burillo
    Milagros Molina-Alarcón
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 529 - 538
  • [37] Induction of Labor and Cesarean Delivery
    Grobman, William A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (09): : 880 - 881
  • [38] The conduct of labor after cesarean section
    Gladden, AH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1926, 11 : 642 - 644
  • [39] CESAREAN SECTION VERSUS TEST OF LABOR
    SCHREIBER, MJ
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1946, 235 (09): : 313 - 314
  • [40] Trial of labor after cesarean section
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Yang, Szu-Ting
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (05): : 739 - 740