Implicit vs. explicit data-flow requirements in Web service composition goals

被引:0
|
作者
Marconi, Annapaola [1 ]
Pistore, Marco [1 ]
Traverso, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] ITC Irst, Via Sommarive 18, Trento, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this paper we compare two different approaches to specify data-flow requirements in Web service composition problems, i.e., requirements on data that are exchanged among component services. Implicit data-flow requirements are a set of rules that specify how the functions computed by the component services are to be combined by the composite service. They implicitly define the required constraints among exchanged data. Explicit data-flow requirements are a set of explicit specifications on how the composition should manipulate messages and route them from/to components. In the paper, we compare these two approaches through an experimental evaluation, both from the point of view of efficiency and scalability and from that of practical usability.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specifying data-flow requirements for the automated composition of Web Services
    Marconi, Annapaola
    Pistore, Marco
    Traverso, Paolo
    SEFM 2006: FOURTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 147 - +
  • [2] A coordination framework of Web service composition to support data-flow distribution
    Zhai, Yan-Long
    Su, Hong-Yi
    Xiao, Wei
    Zhan, Shou-Yi
    Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2009, 29 (12): : 1091 - 1095
  • [3] Data-flow distribution in FICAS service composition infrastructure
    Liu, D
    Law, KH
    Wiederhold, G
    PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2002, : 531 - 536
  • [4] A Testing Method for Web Services Composition Based on Data-Flow
    HOU Jun1
    2. State Key Laboratory of Software Engineering
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2008, (04) : 455 - 460
  • [5] Implicit vs. explicit power motive
    Maliszewski, Norbert
    Jankowska, Klaudyna
    Suszek, Hubert
    PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2014, 12 (01): : 50 - 65
  • [6] Implicit vs. Explicit Learning in Pursuit Tracking
    Sekiya, H.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S105 - S105
  • [7] Implicit vs. explicit resource allocation in SMT processors
    Cazorla, FJ
    Knijnenburg, PMW
    Sakellariou, R
    Fernandez, E
    Ramirez, A
    Valero, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROMICRO SYSTEMS ON DIGITAL SYSTEM DESIGN, 2004, : 44 - 51
  • [8] Implicit vs. Explicit Learning of Pursuit Tracking Patterns
    Magill, R. A.
    Clark, R.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S85 - S85
  • [9] Reach adaptation to explicit vs. implicit target error
    Brendan D. Cameron
    Ian M. Franks
    J. Timothy Inglis
    Romeo Chua
    Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 203 : 367 - 380
  • [10] IMPLICIT VS. EXPLICIT LEARNING IN GERMAN NOUN PLURALS
    Kovic, Vanja
    Westermann, Gert
    Plunkett, Kim
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2008, 41 (04) : 387 - 411