Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA

被引:74
|
作者
Samhouri, Jameal F. [1 ]
Haupt, Alison J. [2 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ]
Link, Jason S. [3 ]
Shuford, Rebecca [4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] NOAA, West Coast Governors Alliance, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[3] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[4] NOAA, Marine Ecosyst Div, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
ecosystem-based management; indicator; integrated ecosystem assessment; marine policy; risk; sustainable marine management and conservation; ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; THRESHOLDS; RECOVERY; BENEFITS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst141
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Borne out of a collective movement towards ecosystem-based management (EBM), multispecies and multi-sector scientific assessments of the ocean are emerging around the world. In the USA, integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) were formally defined 5 years ago to serve as a scientific foundation for marine EBM. As outlined by the US National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration in 2008, an IEA is a cyclical process consisting of setting goals and targets, defining indicators, analysing status, trends, and risk, and evaluating alternative potential future management and environmental scenarios to enhance information needed for effective EBM. These steps should be hierarchical, iterative, non-prescriptive about technical implementation, and adaptable to existing information for any ecosystem. Despite these strengths and some initial successes, IEAs and EBM have yet to be fully realized in the USA. We propose eight tenets that can be adopted by scientists, policy-makers, and managers to enhance the use of IEAs in implementing EBM. These tenets include (i) engage with stakeholders, managers, and policy-makers early, often, and continually; (ii) conduct rigorous human dimensions research; (iii) recognize the importance of transparently selecting indicators; (iv) set ecosystem targets to create a system of EBM accountability; (v) establish a formal mechanism(s) for the review of IEA science; (vi) serve current management needs, but not at the expense of more integrative ocean management; (vii) provide a venue for EBM decision-making that takes full advantage of IEA products; and (viii) embrace realistic expectations about IEA science and its implementation. These tenets are framed in a way that builds on domestic and international experiences with ocean management. With patience, persistence, political will, funding, and augmented capacity, IEAs will provide a general approach for allowing progressive science to lead conventional ocean management to new waters.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1215
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Norwegian plan for integrated ecosystem-based management of the marine environment in the Norwegian Sea
    Ottersen, Geir
    Olsen, Erik
    van der Meeren, Gro I.
    Dommasnes, Are
    Loeng, Harald
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2011, 35 (03) : 389 - 398
  • [22] Risk assessment for marine ecosystem-based management (EBM)
    Clark, Dana E.
    Gladstone-Gallagher, Rebecca, V
    Hewitt, Judi E.
    Stephenson, Fabrice
    Ellis, Joanne, I
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (03)
  • [23] 'Hooks' and 'Anchors' for relational ecosystem-based marine management
    Macpherson, Elizabeth
    Urlich, Stephen C.
    Rennie, Hamish G.
    Paul, Adrienne
    Fisher, Karen
    Braid, Laura
    Banwell, Jill
    Ventura, Julia Torres
    Jorgensen, Eric
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2021, 130
  • [24] Muddy thinking: Ecosystem-based management of marine benthos
    Frid, CLJ
    Robinson, LA
    Bremner, J
    [J]. Benthic Habitats and the Effects of Fishing, 2005, 41 : 651 - 665
  • [25] Is a new mandate needed for marine ecosystem-based management?
    Leslie, Heather M.
    Rosenberg, Andrew A.
    Eagle, Josh
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 6 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [26] Ecosystem-Based Management for Marine Fisheries: An Evolving Perspective
    Emlen, John M.
    [J]. FISHERIES, 2013, 38 (10) : 464 - 464
  • [27] Legal Aspects of Ecosystem-Based Marine Management in Europe
    Long, Ronan
    [J]. OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2012, 26 (01): : 417 - 484
  • [28] Perspectives on ecosystem-based approaches to the management of marine resources
    Browman, HI
    Stergiou, KI
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 274 : 269 - 270
  • [29] Marine ecosystem-based management as a hierarchical control system
    de la Mare, WK
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2005, 29 (01) : 57 - 68
  • [30] Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management
    Leslie, Heather M.
    McLeod, Karen L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 5 (10) : 540 - 548