Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA

被引:74
|
作者
Samhouri, Jameal F. [1 ]
Haupt, Alison J. [2 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ]
Link, Jason S. [3 ]
Shuford, Rebecca [4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] NOAA, West Coast Governors Alliance, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[3] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[4] NOAA, Marine Ecosyst Div, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
ecosystem-based management; indicator; integrated ecosystem assessment; marine policy; risk; sustainable marine management and conservation; ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; THRESHOLDS; RECOVERY; BENEFITS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst141
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Borne out of a collective movement towards ecosystem-based management (EBM), multispecies and multi-sector scientific assessments of the ocean are emerging around the world. In the USA, integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) were formally defined 5 years ago to serve as a scientific foundation for marine EBM. As outlined by the US National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration in 2008, an IEA is a cyclical process consisting of setting goals and targets, defining indicators, analysing status, trends, and risk, and evaluating alternative potential future management and environmental scenarios to enhance information needed for effective EBM. These steps should be hierarchical, iterative, non-prescriptive about technical implementation, and adaptable to existing information for any ecosystem. Despite these strengths and some initial successes, IEAs and EBM have yet to be fully realized in the USA. We propose eight tenets that can be adopted by scientists, policy-makers, and managers to enhance the use of IEAs in implementing EBM. These tenets include (i) engage with stakeholders, managers, and policy-makers early, often, and continually; (ii) conduct rigorous human dimensions research; (iii) recognize the importance of transparently selecting indicators; (iv) set ecosystem targets to create a system of EBM accountability; (v) establish a formal mechanism(s) for the review of IEA science; (vi) serve current management needs, but not at the expense of more integrative ocean management; (vii) provide a venue for EBM decision-making that takes full advantage of IEA products; and (viii) embrace realistic expectations about IEA science and its implementation. These tenets are framed in a way that builds on domestic and international experiences with ocean management. With patience, persistence, political will, funding, and augmented capacity, IEAs will provide a general approach for allowing progressive science to lead conventional ocean management to new waters.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1215
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated Ecosystem Assessments: Developing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem-Based Management of the Ocean
    Levin, Phillip S.
    Fogarty, Michael J.
    Murawski, Steven A.
    Fluharty, David
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [2] OVERVIEW OF ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENTS
    Link, Jason S.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS REPORTS, 2012, 53 : 91 - 92
  • [3] Linking Ecosystem Health and Services to Inform Marine Ecosystem-Based Management
    Arkema, Katie K.
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    [J]. ADVANCING AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN THE GULF OF MARINE, 2012, 79 : 9 - +
  • [4] Implementing marine ecosystem-based management: lessons from Australia
    Smith, David C.
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Apfel, Petrina
    Cresswell, Ian D.
    Gillanders, Bronwyn M.
    Haward, Marcus
    Sainsbury, Keith J.
    Smith, Anthony D. M.
    Vince, Joanna
    Ward, Tim M.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (07) : 1990 - 2003
  • [5] Literature syntheses to inform marine ecosystem management: lessons learned from stakeholder participation
    Kuhn, Tinka
    Vikstroem, Suvi
    Suskevics, Monika
    Storie, Joanna T.
    Saikkonen, Liisa
    Rees, Rebecca
    Hakansson, Cecilia
    Oinonen, Soile
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [6] Lessons from experience with ecosystem-based management
    Slocombe, DS
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1998, 40 (1-3) : 31 - 39
  • [7] Lessons learned from an ecosystem-based management approach to restoration of a California estuary
    Wasson, Kerstin
    Suarez, Becky
    Akhavan, Antonia
    McCarthy, Erin
    Kildow, Judith
    Johnson, Kenneth S.
    Fountain, Monique C.
    Woolfolk, Andrea
    Silberstein, Mark
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Feliz, Dave
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 58 : 60 - 70
  • [8] Marine ecosystem-based management in practice; Different pathways, common lessons
    Keysar, Elizabeth
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2018, 20 (01) : 36 - 37
  • [9] Icarus and Daedalus: conceptual and tactical lessons for marine ecosystem-based management
    Guerry, AD
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 3 (04) : 202 - 211
  • [10] Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation
    Arkema, Katie K.
    Abramson, Sarah C.
    Dewsbury, Bryan M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 4 (10) : 525 - 532