Spatial Assessment of Solar Radiation by Machine Learning and Deep Neural Network Models Using Data Provided by the COMS MI Geostationary Satellite: A Case Study in South Korea

被引:38
|
作者
Yeom, Jong-Min [1 ]
Park, Seonyoung [1 ]
Chae, Taebyeong [1 ]
Kim, Jin-Young [2 ]
Lee, Chang Suk [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Aerosp Res Inst, Satellite Applicat Div, 115 Gwahangno, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Energy Res, New & Renewable Energy Resource & Policy Ctr, 152 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34129, South Korea
[3] Natl Inst Environm Res, Environm Satellite Ctr, 42 Hwangyeong Ro, Incheon 22689, South Korea
关键词
solar radiation; artificial neural network; random forest; support vector machine; deep neural network; COMS MI; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; SHORTWAVE RADIATION; BELIEF NETWORKS; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; FOREST; CLOUD; MODIS; RESOLUTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3390/s19092082
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Although data-driven methods including deep neural network (DNN) were introduced, there was not enough assessment about spatial characteristics when using limited ground observation as reference. This work aimed to interpret the feasibility of several machine learning approaches to assess the spatial distribution of solar radiation on Earth based on the Communication, Ocean, and Meteorological Satellite (COMS) Meteorological Imager (MI) geostationary satellite. Four data-driven models were selected (artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and DNN), to compare their accuracy and spatial estimating performance. Moreover, we used a physical model to probe the ability of data-driven methods, implementing hold-out and k-fold cross-validation approaches based on pyranometers located in South Korea. The results of analysis showed the RF had the highest accuracy in predicting performance, although the difference between RF and the second-best technique (DNN) was insignificant. Temporal variations in root mean square error (RMSE) were dependent on the number of data samples, while the physical model showed relatively less sensitivity. Nevertheless, DNN and RF showed less variability in RMSE than the others. To examine spatial estimation performance, we mapped solar radiation over South Korea for each model. The data-driven models accurately simulated the observed cloud pattern spatially, whereas the physical model failed to do because of cloud mask errors. These exhibited different spatial retrieval performances according to their own training approaches. Overall analysis showed that deeper layers of networks approaches (RF and DNN), could best simulate the challenging spatial pattern of thin clouds when using satellite multispectral data.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条