Deletions at stalled replication forks occur by two different pathways

被引:68
|
作者
Bierne, H [1 ]
Ehrlich, SD [1 ]
Michel, B [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA,LAB GENET MICROBIENNE,F-78352 JOUY EN JOSAS,FRANCE
来源
EMBO JOURNAL | 1997年 / 16卷 / 11期
关键词
double-strand break; illegitimate recombination; RecBCD; replication terminators; topoisomerase I;
D O I
10.1093/emboj/16.11.3332
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Replication blockage induces non-homologous deletions in Escherichia coli. The mechanism of the formation of these deletions was investigated. A pBR322-mini-oriC hybrid plasmid carrying two E.coli replication terminators (Ter sites) in opposite orientations was used. Deletions which remove at least the pBR322 blocking site (named Ter1) occurred at a frequency of 2x10(-6) per generation. They fall into tyro equally large classes: deletions that join sequences with no homology, and others that join sequences of 3-10 bp of homology. Some 95% of the deletions in the former class resulted from the fusion of sequences immediately preceding the two Ter sites, indicating a direct role for blocked replication forks in their formation. These deletions were not found in a topA10 mutant, suggesting a topoisomerase I-mediated process. In contrast, deletions joining short homologous sequences were not affected by the topA10 mutation. However, the incidence of this second class of deletions increased 10-fold in a recD mutant, devoid of exonuclease V activity, This indicates that linear molecules are intermediates in their formation. In addition, similar to 50% of these deletions mere clustered in the region flanking the Ter1 site. We propose that they are produced by repair of molecules broken at the blocked replication forks.
引用
收藏
页码:3332 / 3340
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stalled replication forks within heterochromatin require ATRX for protection
    Huh, M. S.
    Ivanochko, D.
    Hashem, L. E.
    Curtin, M.
    Delorme, M.
    Goodall, E.
    Yan, K.
    Picketts, D. J.
    CELL DEATH & DISEASE, 2016, 7 : e2220 - e2220
  • [42] FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks
    Fugger, Kasper
    Mistrik, Martin
    Neelsen, Kai J.
    Yao, Qi
    Zellweger, Ralph
    Kousholt, Arne Nedergaard
    Haahr, Peter
    Chu, Wai Kit
    Bartek, Jiri
    Lopes, Massimo
    Hickson, Ian D.
    Sorensen, Claus Storgaard
    CELL REPORTS, 2015, 10 (10): : 1749 - 1757
  • [43] HUWE1 comes to the rescue at stalled replication forks
    Coleman, Kate E.
    Huang, Tony T.
    EMBO REPORTS, 2016, 17 (06) : 781 - 782
  • [44] Formation and processing of stalled replication forks-utility of two-dimensional agarose gels
    Pohlhaus, Jennifer Reineke
    Kreuzer, Kenneth N.
    DNA REPAIR, PT B, 2006, 409 : 477 - 493
  • [45] Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks
    Kanoh, Yutaka
    Tamai, Katsuyuki
    Shirahige, Katsuhiko
    GENE, 2006, 377 : 88 - 95
  • [46] PARP1 UFMylation ensures the stability of stalled replication forks
    Gong, Yamin
    Wang, Zhifeng
    Zong, Wen
    Shi, Ruifeng
    Sun, Wenli
    Wang, Sijia
    Peng, Bin
    Takeda, Shunichi
    Wang, Zhao-Qi
    Xu, Xingzhi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (18)
  • [47] Hyperthermia Inhibits Recombination Repair of Gemcitabine-Stalled Replication Forks
    Raoof, Mustafa
    Zhu, Cihui
    Cisneros, Brandon T.
    Liu, Heping
    Corr, Stuart J.
    Wilson, Lon J.
    Curley, Steven A.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (08):
  • [48] Keeping It Together in Times of Stress: Checkpoint Function at Stalled Replication Forks
    Berens, Theresa J.
    Toczyski, David P.
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2012, 45 (05) : 585 - 586
  • [49] A model of DNA damage response activation at stalled replication forks by SPRTN
    Christopher Bruhn
    Marco Foiani
    Nature Communications, 10
  • [50] Radiation induced DNA DSBs: Contribution from stalled replication forks?
    Harper, Jane V.
    Anderson, Jennifer A.
    O'Neill, Peter
    DNA REPAIR, 2010, 9 (08) : 907 - 913