The Cassini Mission probabilistic risk analysis: comparison of two probabilistic dynamic methodologies

被引:10
|
作者
Swaminathan, S
VanHalle, JY
Smidts, C
Mosleh, A
Bell, S
Rudolph, K
Mulvihill, RJ
Bream, B
机构
[1] UNIV MARYLAND,DEPT MAT & NUCL ENGN,COLLEGE PK,MD 20742
[2] MARTIN MARIETTA SYST,DENVER,CO
[3] PRC INC,EL SEGUNDO,CA
[4] NASA,LEWIS RES CTR,CLEVELAND,OH 44135
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00052-5
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes a comparison between two dynamic methodologies used in the probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) of the Cassini Mission. The main Cassini PRA was performed by Lockheed Martin. A combination of Monte Carlo algorithms and event-tree logic was used to perform the study. Results were validated using an alternative method, the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree (DDET) methodology. Two major conclusions of the paper are 1) performing a dynamic PRA of large scale 'real-life' systems is feasible and 2) given the same ground rules and assumptions, two dynamic methodologies would give the same results. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cassini Mission probabilistic risk analysis: comparison of two probabilistic dynamic methodologies
    Univ of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 1 (1-14):
  • [2] Uncertainty analysis in probabilistic risk assessment: Comparison of probabilistic and non probabilistic approaches
    Vasseur, Dominique
    Tu Duong Le Duy
    Dutfoy, Anne
    Dieulle, Laurence
    Berenguer, Christophe
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2189 - 2196
  • [3] Probabilistic risk assessment modeling of digital instrumentation and control systems using two dynamic methodologies
    Aldemir, T.
    Guarro, S.
    Mandelli, D.
    Kirschenbaum, J.
    Mangan, L. A.
    Bucci, P.
    Yau, M.
    Ekici, E.
    Miller, D. W.
    Sun, X.
    Arndt, S. A.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (10) : 1011 - 1039
  • [4] Comparison of Two Solar Probabilistic Forecasting Methodologies for Microgrids Energy Efficiency
    Mazorra-Aguiar, Luis
    Lauret, Philippe
    David, Mathieu
    Oliver, Albert
    Montero, Gustavo
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [5] Comparison of methodologies for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting
    Applequist, S
    Gahrs, GE
    Pfeffer, RL
    Niu, XF
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2002, 17 (04) : 783 - 799
  • [6] PROBABILISTIC MODELING OF AERATED LAGOONS - A COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES
    LEDUC, R
    OULDALI, S
    STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS, 1990, 4 (01): : 65 - 81
  • [7] CANADIAN METHODOLOGIES OF PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC RISK ESTIMATION
    WEICHERT, DH
    MILNE, WG
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1979, 69 (05) : 1549 - 1566
  • [8] Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods
    Maidana, Renan G.
    Parhizkar, Tarannom
    Gomola, Alojz
    Utne, Ingrid B.
    Mosleh, Ali
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [9] A comparison of scenario binning methods for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment
    Metzroth, K.
    Mandelli, D.
    Yilmaz, A.
    Denning, R.
    Aldemir, T.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 261 - 268
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Static and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment
    Mattenberger, Christopher J.
    Mathias, Donovan L.
    Go, Susie
    2015 61ST ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2015), 2015,