Achieving change in primary care-effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews

被引:139
|
作者
Lau, Rosa [1 ]
Stevenson, Fiona [1 ]
Ong, Bie Nio [2 ]
Dziedzic, Krysia [2 ]
Treweek, Shaun [3 ]
Eldridge, Sandra [4 ]
Everitt, Hazel [5 ]
Kennedy, Anne [6 ]
Qureshi, Nadeem [7 ]
Rogers, Anne [6 ]
Peacock, Richard [8 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, eHealth Unit, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[2] Keele Univ, Res Inst Primary Care Sci & Hlth Sci, Arthrit Res UK Primary Care Ctr, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Primary Care & Populat Sci, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[6] Univ Southampton, NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Div Primary Care, Derby, England
[8] Archway Healthcare Lib, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 12期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; Implementation; Systematic review; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE INTERVENTIONS; CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; MENTAL-HEALTH; GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; PREVENTIVE CARE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care. Design Systematic review of reviews. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Eligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion. Data synthesis Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach. Results 91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2-9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality. Conclusions There is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies. PROSPERO registration number CRD42014009410.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question
    Squires, Janet E.
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1215 - 1222
  • [32] Practice-level quality improvement interventions in primary care: a review of systematic reviews
    Irwin, Ryan
    Stokes, Tim
    Marshall, Tom
    [J]. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 16 (06): : 556 - 577
  • [33] The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: a systematic review
    Kaat Goorts
    Janine Dizon
    Steve Milanese
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [34] The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: a systematic review
    Goorts, Kaat
    Dizon, Janine
    Milanese, Steve
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [35] Generalizability of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health care interventions to primary health care: concepts, methods and future research
    Nasser, Mona
    van Weel, Chris
    van Binsbergen, Jaap J.
    van de Laar, Floris A.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 29 : i94 - i103
  • [36] The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews
    Jepson, Ruth G.
    Harris, Fiona M.
    Platt, Stephen
    Tannahill, Carol
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [37] Effectiveness of educational interventions in primary care mental health: a qualitative systematic review
    Howe, Amanda
    Ashton, Kate
    Hooper, Lee
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE & COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 11 (04) : 167 - 177
  • [38] The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews
    Ruth G Jepson
    Fiona M Harris
    Stephen Platt
    Carol Tannahill
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 10
  • [39] Delivering Opportunistic Behavior Change Interventions: a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Keyworth, Chris
    Epton, Tracy
    Goldthorpe, Joanna
    Calam, Rachel
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2020, 21 (03) : 319 - 331
  • [40] Delivering Opportunistic Behavior Change Interventions: a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Chris Keyworth
    Tracy Epton
    Joanna Goldthorpe
    Rachel Calam
    Christopher J. Armitage
    [J]. Prevention Science, 2020, 21 : 319 - 331