Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation

被引:399
|
作者
Fuchs, Thomas [1 ,3 ]
De Jaegher, Hanne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Psychiat, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Sussex, Ctr Computat Neurosci & Robot, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychiat, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Coordination; Enaction; Infancy; Intercorporality; Intersubjectivity; Participatory sense-making; Phenomenology; Social interaction; DIRECT PERCEPTION; COORDINATION; SIMULATION; IMITATION; PATTERNS; GESTURES; AUTISM;
D O I
10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Current theories of social cognition are mainly based on a representationalist view. Moreover, they focus on a rather sophisticated and limited aspect of understanding others, i.e. on how we predict and explain others' behaviours through representing their mental states. Research into the 'social brain' has also favoured a third-person paradigm of social cognition as a passive observation of others' behaviour, attributing it to an inferential, simulative or projective process in the individual brain. In this paper, we present a concept of social understanding as an ongoing, dynamical process of participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. This process may be described (1) from a dynamical agentive systems point of view as an interaction and coordination of two embodied agents; (2) from a phenomenological approach as a mutual incorporation, i.e. a process in which the lived bodies of both participants extend and form a common intercorporality. Intersubjectivity, it is argued, is not a solitary task of deciphering or simulating the movements of others but means entering a process of embodied interaction and generating common meaning through it. This approach will be further illustrated by an analysis of primary dyadic interaction in early childhood.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 486
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mainstream Economics and Sense-Making
    Salvatore, Sergio
    Davanzati, Guglielmo Forges
    Poti, Silvia
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    INTEGRATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2009, 43 (02) : 158 - 177
  • [42] Specifying Revolutionary Sense-Making
    Hoburg, Patrick
    CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS, 2015, 10 (03): : 422 - 425
  • [43] SENSE-MAKING IN A DATABASE ENVIRONMENT
    JACOBSON, TL
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1991, 27 (06) : 647 - 657
  • [44] Online Group Dynamics and Participatory Sense-Making: the case of Affective Polarization in Pandemic Times
    Borrelli, Dario
    Iandoli, Luca
    Babvey, Pouria
    Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel
    Lipizzi, Carlo
    15TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS (IFKAD 2020): KNOWLEDGE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 556 - 569
  • [45] #ActuallyAutistic Sense-Making on Twitter
    Zolyomi, Annuska
    Jones, Ridley
    Kaftan, Tomer
    22ND INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY (ASSETS '20), 2020,
  • [46] Sense-making under ignorance
    Johnson, Samuel G. B.
    Rajeev-Kumar, Greeshma
    Keil, Frank C.
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 89 : 39 - 70
  • [47] Leadership, gender and sense-making
    Grisoni, Louise
    Beeby, Mick
    GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2007, 14 (03): : 191 - 209
  • [48] Making sense of visitors' sense-making experiences: the REMIND method
    Schmitt, Daniel
    Labour, Michel
    MUSEUM MANAGEMENT AND CURATORSHIP, 2022, 37 (03) : 218 - 234
  • [49] Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making. Making Sense of Non-Sense
    Ramirez Vizcaya, Susana
    OPEN INSIGHT, 2018, 9 (15): : 305 - 319
  • [50] Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent
    Davis, Nicholas
    Hsiao, Chih-Pin
    Singh, Kunwar Yashraj
    Li, Lisa
    Magerko, Brian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES (IUI'16), 2016, : 196 - 207