Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix to Augment Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness Compared with Autogenous Connective Tissue Graf: A Systems is Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:43
|
作者
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ,2 ]
Barootchi, Shayan [2 ]
Tavelli, Lorenzo [2 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, 1011 North Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
collagen matrix; connective tissue; dental implants; keratinized tissue; meta-analysis; soft tissue management; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAPS; FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ROOT COVERAGE; VOLUME AUGMENTATION; RECESSION; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7497
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several approaches for increasing peri-implant mucosal thickness have been proposed, including autogenous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic grafts. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze whether xenogeneic matrices are viable alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed to select randomized clinical trials that compared connective tissue grafts and xenogeneic collagen matrices. The primary outcomes were the mucosal thickness and keratinized mucosa changes, while the secondary outcomes were patient morbidity, painkiller consumption, and surgical time required for the procedure. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials were included for the final evaluation with a total number of 218 implant sites (108 in the connective tissue graft group, 110 in the collagen matrix group) with 3 to 12 months (mean: 6 months) followup period. Results showed mucosal thickness increase in both buccal and crestal sites, but it did not yield statistical significance. The keratinized mucosa gain difference was only -0.06 mm (95% CI [-30.0, 0.18]) between the treatments. The postsurgical discomfort, increased consumption of painkillers, and reduction of treatment time (15.46 minutes less) differed significantly in favor of the collagen matrix group. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that collagen matrix and connective tissue graft are equivalent in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1064
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Titanium abutment surface modifications and peri-implant tissue behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luigi Canullo
    Maria Menini
    Gregorio Santori
    Mia Rakic
    Anton Sculean
    Paolo Pesce
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 1113 - 1124
  • [32] Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jepsen, Karin
    Sailer, Irena
    Strasding, Malin
    Zeltner, Marco
    Cordaro, Luca
    Mirisola di Torresanto, Vincenzo
    Schwarz, Frank
    Zuhr, Otto
    Akakpo, Dodji
    Bonnet, Franck
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (09) : 999 - 1013
  • [33] The Use of Tissue Grafts Associated with Immediate Implant Placement to Achieve Better Peri-Implant Stability and Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rondone, Enrico Maria
    Leitao-Almeida, Bruno
    Pereira, Miguel Silva
    Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira
    Borges, Tiago
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [34] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Igor Ashurko
    Svetlana Tarasenko
    Aleksandr Esayan
    Alexandr Kurkov
    Karen Mikaelyan
    Maxim Balyasin
    Anna Galyas
    Julia Kustova
    Silvio Taschieri
    Stefano Corbella
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 7191 - 7208
  • [35] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Ashurko, Igor
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Esayan, Aleksandr
    Kurkov, Alexandr
    Mikaelyan, Karen
    Balyasin, Maxim
    Galyas, Anna
    Kustova, Julia
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Corbella, Stefano
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (12) : 7191 - 7208
  • [36] Efficacy of soft tissue substitutes, in comparison with autogenous grafts, in surgical procedures aiming to increase the peri-implant keratinized mucosa: A systematic review
    Montero, Eduardo
    Molina, Ana
    Matesanz, Paula
    Monje, Alberto
    Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio
    Herrera, David
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 : 32 - 46
  • [37] Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Increase at Small Buccal Bone Dehiscences With Either Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Francesco, Ferrarotti
    Giacomo, Baima
    Giulia, Mohammadi
    Clelia, Carboncini
    Federica, Romano
    Mario, Aimetti
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [38] Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Free Gingival Graft for Augmenting Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Atieh, Momen A.
    Shah, Maanas
    Hakam, Abeer
    Alshaali, Suhailah
    Kasouha, Reem
    Tawse-Smith, Andrew
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 10 (04):
  • [39] Immediate Implant Placement with Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Galve-Huertas, Andrea
    Decadt, Louis
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Susana
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    Centenero, Samir Aboul-Hosn
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [40] The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on aesthetic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bienz, Stefan P.
    Pirc, Miha
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 : 56 - 71