Citizen Science and Biological Invasions: A Review

被引:70
|
作者
Encarnacao, Joao [1 ]
Teodosio, Maria Alexandra [1 ]
Morais, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Algarve, Ctr Marine Sci CCMAR, Campus Gambelas, Faro, Portugal
关键词
citizen science; invasive species; non-indigenous species; early detection; monitoring; integrated management;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2020.602980
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biological invasions are among the most challenging ecological and conservation riddles of our times. Fortunately, citizen science projects became a valuable tool to detect non-indigenous species (NIS), document their spread, prevent dispersion, and eradicate localized populations. We evaluated the most undisputed definitions of citizen science and proposed that a combination of two of them is a better reflection of what citizen science has become. Thus, citizen science is any environmental and/or biological data collection and analysis, including data quality control, undertaken by members of the general public, as individuals or as organized groups of citizens, with the guidance and/or assistance of scientists toward solving environmental and/or community questions. With this review, we also assessed how citizen science has been advancing biological invasions research and its focus, by analyzing 126 peer-reviewed articles that used citizen science methods or data concerning NIS. Most of the articles studied terrestrial species (68%) and terrestrial plants were the most studied group (22.7%). Surprisingly, most first detection reports were of non-indigenous marine fish probably due to the constraints in accessing aquatic ecosystems which delays the detection of new NIS. Citizen science projects running over broad geographical areas are very cost-effective for the early detection of NIS, regardless of the studied environment. We also discuss the applicability and need to adapt the methods and approaches toward the studied ecosystem and species, but also the profile of the participating citizens, their motivations, level of engagement, or social status. We recommend authors to better acknowledge the work done by contributing citizens, and the putative limitations of data generated by citizen science projects. The outreach planning of citizen science projects is also evaluated, including the use of dedicated web platforms vs. pre-existent and disseminated web platforms, while discussing how such outreach actions can be maximized. Lastly, we present a framework that contextualizes the contributions of citizen science, scientific research, and regional and national stakeholders toward the integrated management of biological invasions.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eyes on the aliens: citizen science contributes to research, policy and management of biological invasions in Europe
    Price-Jones, Veronica
    Brown, Peter M. J.
    Adriaens, Tim
    Tricarico, Elena
    Farrow, Rachel A.
    Cardoso, Ana Cristina
    Gervasini, Eugenio
    Groom, Quentin
    Reyserhove, Lien
    Schade, Sven
    Tsinaraki, Chrisa
    Marchante, Elizabete
    NEOBIOTA, 2022, 78 : 1 - 24
  • [2] Citizen science at school increases awareness of biological invasions and contributes to the detection of exotic ambrosia beetles
    Colombari, Fernanda
    Battisti, Andrea
    NEOBIOTA, 2023, 84 : 211 - 229
  • [3] Monitoring urban biological invasions using citizen science: the polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea fornicatus)
    Potgieter, Luke J.
    Cadotte, Marc W.
    Roets, Francois
    Richardson, David M.
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2024, 97 (04) : 2073 - 2085
  • [4] Biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems - Science and management
    Pascal, Michel
    CAHIERS DE BIOLOGIE MARINE, 2012, 53 (03): : 319 - 325
  • [5] The role of refuges in biological invasions: A systematic review
    Boon, James S.
    Keith, Sally A.
    Exton, Dan A.
    Field, Richard
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2023, 32 (08): : 1244 - 1271
  • [6] A review of the impacts of biological invasions in South Africa
    van Wilgen, Brian W.
    Zengeya, Tsungai A.
    Richardson, David M.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2022, 24 (01) : 27 - 50
  • [7] A review of the impacts of biological invasions in South Africa
    Brian W. van Wilgen
    Tsungai A. Zengeya
    David M. Richardson
    Biological Invasions, 2022, 24 : 27 - 50
  • [8] The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    Roy, Helen E.
    Preston, Chris D.
    Roy, David B.
    BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2015, 115 (03) : 475 - 493
  • [9] Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war?
    Hulme, PE
    ORYX, 2003, 37 (02) : 178 - 193
  • [10] Biological invasions and natural colonisations are different - the need for invasion science
    Wilson, John R. U.
    Garcia-Diaz, Pablo
    Cassey, Phillip
    Richardson, David M.
    Pysek, Petr
    Blackburn, Tim M.
    NEOBIOTA, 2016, (31) : 87 - 98