Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:24
|
作者
Brun, Ole-Christian L. [1 ,2 ]
Sund, Helge N. [1 ,3 ]
Nordsletten, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Rohrl, Stephan M. [1 ]
Mjaaland, Knut E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ulleval Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, POB 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Sorlandet Hosp HF, Arendal, Kristiansand, Norway
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2019年 / 34卷 / 08期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; randomized controlled trial; minimally invasive anterior approach; direct lateral approach; component placement; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ANGLE; COMPLICATIONS; INCLINATION; WEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA. Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m(2), and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy. Results: The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5 degrees, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6 degrees, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P <. 0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy. Conclusion: In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1718 / 1722
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Response to "A Tale of Two Approaches": Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Barrett, William
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07): : 1507 - 1508
  • [22] Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Suarez, Juan C.
    Slotkin, Eric M.
    Szubski, Caleb R.
    Barsoum, Wael K.
    Patel, Preetesh D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (11): : 1953 - 1958
  • [23] Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Moerenhout, Kevin
    Derome, Pascale
    Laflamme, G. Yves
    Leduc, Stephane
    Gaspard, Henry S.
    Benoit, Benoit
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 63 (05) : E412 - E417
  • [24] Minimally invasive posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Prospective randomised trial
    Varela-Egocheaga, J. R.
    Suarez-Suarez, M. A.
    Fernandez-Villan, M.
    Gonzalez-Sastre, V.
    Varela-Gomez, J. R.
    Murcia-Mazon, A.
    ANALES DEL SISTEMA SANITARIO DE NAVARRA, 2010, 33 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [25] Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in the supine position: a prospective study based on early postoperative outcomes
    Liu, Hongwen
    Yin, Li
    Li, Jiao
    Liu, Shaojiang
    Tao, Qifeng
    Xu, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [26] Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in the supine position: a prospective study based on early postoperative outcomes
    Hongwen Liu
    Li Yin
    Jiao Li
    Shaojiang Liu
    Qifeng Tao
    Jie Xu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [27] DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN LATERAL DECUBITUS
    Zha, Xiaowei
    Liu, Wei
    Cheng, Wendan
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2020, 36 (04): : 2445 - 2452
  • [28] Early Clinical and Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty
    Alexandrov, Tamara
    Ahlmann, Elke R.
    Menendez, Lawrence R.
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 2014
  • [29] Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach
    Kennon, RE
    Keggi, JM
    Wetmore, RS
    Zatorski, LE
    Huo, MH
    Keggi, KJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A : 39 - 48
  • [30] Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Beyond the minimally invasive technique
    Kennon, R
    Keggi, J
    Zatorski, LE
    Keggi, KJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A : 91 - 97