Histologic and Functional Outcomes of Conduit Wrapping for Peripheral Nerve Repair: Early Results in a Rat Model

被引:2
|
作者
Brogan, David M. [1 ]
Dy, Christopher J. [1 ]
Lee, Tony Y. [1 ]
Rioux-Forker, Dana [2 ]
Wever, Jason [1 ]
Leversedge, Fraser J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, 425 South Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8233, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Plast Surg, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthoped Surg, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
conduit; nerve repair; nerve wrap; peripheral nerve; conduit wrap; regeneration; PORCINE EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; WALKING TRACK ANALYSIS; INJURY; REGENERATION; RECURRENT; RECOVERY; SITES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1722762
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The concept of utilizing a nerve conduit for augmentation of a primary nerve repair has been advocated as a method to prevent neural scarring and decrease adhesions. Despite clinical use, little is known about the effects of a nerve conduit wrapped around a primary repair. To better understand this, we investigated the histologic and functional effects of use of a nerve conduit wrapped around a rat sciatic nerve repair without tension. Methods Twenty Lewis' rats were divided into two groups of 10 rats each. In each group, unilateral sciatic nerve transection and repair were performed, with the opposite limb utilized as a matched control. In the first group, direct repair alone was performed; in the second group, this repair was augmented with a porcine submucosa conduit wrapped around the repair site. Sciatic functional index (SFI) was measured at 6 weeks with walking track analysis in both groups. Nonsurvival surgeries were then performed in all animals to harvest both the experimental and control nerves to measure histomorphometric parameters of recovery. Histomorphometric parameters assessed included total number of neurons, nerve fiber density, nerve fiber width, G-ratio, and percentage of debris. Unpaired t -test was used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results All nerves healed uneventfully but compared with direct repair; conduit usage was associated with greater histologic debris, decreased axonal density, worse G-ratio, and worse SFI. No significant differences were found in total axon count or gastrocnemius weight. Conclusion In the absence of segmental defects, conduit wrapping primary nerve repairs seem to be associated with worse functional and mixed histologic outcomes at 6 weeks, possibly due to debris from conduit resorption. While clinical implications are unclear, more basic science and clinical studies should be performed prior to widespread adoption of this practice.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 565
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A tissue-engineered conduit for peripheral nerve repair
    Hadlock, T
    Elisseeff, J
    Langer, R
    Vacanti, J
    Cheney, M
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (10) : 1081 - 1086
  • [22] Delayed repair of the peripheral nerve: A novel model in the rat sciatic nerve
    Wu, Peng
    Spinner, Robert J.
    Gu, Yudong
    Yaszemski, Michael J.
    Windebank, Anthony J.
    Wang, Huan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2013, 214 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [23] Construction of a mineralized collagen nerve conduit for peripheral nerve injury repair
    Duan, Guman
    Li, Chengli
    Yan, Xiaoqing
    Yang, Shuhui
    Wang, Shuo
    Sun, Xiaodan
    Zhao, Lingyun
    Song, Tianxi
    Pan, Yongwei
    Wang, Xiumei
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 10
  • [24] Trigeminal or peripheral nerve stimulation improves functional outcomes of nerve recovery in a rodent forelimb gap repair model
    Nicksic, Peter J.
    Donnelly, D'Andrea T.
    Zeng, Weifeng
    Seitz, Allison J.
    Poore, Samuel O.
    Suminski, Aaron J.
    Dingle, Aaron M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 88 : 57 - 65
  • [25] Improving electrophysiologic and histologic outcomes by photochemically sealing amnion to the peripheral nerve repair site
    Henry, Francis P.
    Goyal, Namita A.
    David, William S.
    Wes, David
    Bujold, Kenneth E.
    Randolph, Mark A.
    Winograd, Jonathan M.
    Kochevar, Irene E.
    Redmond, Robert W.
    SURGERY, 2009, 145 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [26] COMPARISONS OF THE RESULTS OF PERIPHERAL NERVE DEFECT REPAIR WITH FIBRIN CONDUIT AND AUTOLOGOUS NERVE GRAFT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RATS
    Losso Longo, Marco Vinicius
    Marques De Faria, Jose Carlos
    Isaac, Cesar
    Nepomuceno, Andre Coelho
    Teixeira, Nuberto Hopfgartner
    Gemperli, Rolf
    MICROSURGERY, 2016, 36 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [27] A NONINVASIVE FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL-NERVE REPAIR WITH ELECTROMYOGRAPHY IN A RAT MODEL
    ZENG, L
    WORSEG, A
    ALBRECHT, G
    GRISOLD, W
    HOPF, R
    REDL, H
    SCHLAG, G
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 94 (01) : 146 - 151
  • [28] Histologic and functional outcomes of nerve defects treated with acellular allograft versus cabled autograft in a rat model
    Tang, Peter
    Kilic, Ayhan
    Konopka, Geoffrey
    Regalbuto, Ricky
    Akelina, Yelena
    Gardner, Thomas
    MICROSURGERY, 2013, 33 (06) : 460 - 467
  • [29] Magnetic Assembly of a Multifunctional Guidance Conduit for Peripheral Nerve Repair
    Antman-Passig, Merav
    Giron, Jonathan
    Karni, Moshe
    Motiei, Menachem
    Schori, Hadas
    Shefi, Orit
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2021, 31 (29)
  • [30] Conductive conduit small gap tubulization for peripheral nerve repair
    Fang, Xingxing
    Deng, Jiuxu
    Zhang, Wei
    Guo, Haichang
    Yu, Fei
    Rao, Feng
    Li, Qicheng
    Zhang, Peixun
    Bai, Shulin
    Jiang, Baoguo
    RSC ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (28) : 16769 - 16775